The GOP’s Midterm Reversal of Fortune
The Reactions the Tina Peters' Clemency Have Been Off the Rails...and This Dem...
UK PM Reportedly Keir Starmer About to Resign, But There's a Catch
This C-Span Caller Said He Regretted Voting for Trump. Here's the Problem
ESPN Host Couldn't Let This Caller Get Away With This Swipe at Conservatives
When Rich Liberals Beg
The NHS Is About to Get Slammed With Discrimination Claims Following Tribunal's Ruling
Italian Officials Are Now Saying Yesterday's Car Attack Wasn't Terrorism, but This Instead
Prominent Jewish Leaders Call for a Boycott of Zohran Mamdani, Citing Surging Antisemitism
Israel Has Intercepted Another 'Humanitarian' Flotilla Headed Toward Gaza
Here's Why a Female Police Officer in Norfolk Was Suspended From Her Job
Social Security Is Earned—and Washington Must Protect It
There Are Enemies and Then There Are Enemies
Book Review: Douglas Brunt’s The Lost Empire of Emanuel Nobel
Bay Area Report on ICE Raids Is Peak Elite Cope
Tipsheet

DHS To SCOTUS On Travel Ban Decision: Thanks For Allowing Us To Protect The Nation

DHS To SCOTUS On Travel Ban Decision: Thanks For Allowing Us To Protect The Nation

It’s been a long legal road, but the Trump administration will be able to enforce most of its executive order on immigration that included a travel moratorium on six predominantly Muslim countries: Sudan, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Iran, and Yemen. These nations are either embroiled in civil war, failed states, or state sponsors of terror. Second, it’s not a Muslim ban; people from Indonesia—the world’s most populous Muslim country—can still come here. Nevertheless, liberals thought the order was unconstitutional based on religious discrimination. They were able to get injunctions against the first order from Washington State’s Attorney General Bob Ferguson. It was granted. The second revised version, which cleared up the legal haze over green card holders, was also targeted by liberals, with New York, Minnesota, Washington, and Oregon filing motions to block its enforcement. Hawaii was able to block the order, which then turned into a preliminary injunction. Recently, the state rolled back portions of the injunction relating to impact studies on anti-terror initiatives, according to Politico. The Trump White House filed multiple appeals, with the Fourth and Ninth Circuit rejecting arguments to reinstate the so-called ban. For the Ninth Circuit, they rejected the appeal twice.

Advertisement

In May, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said they would request the Supreme Court settle this matter. Today, as Christine wrote, they did—overturning the injunction on the order, agreeing to hear arguments on the ban, and allowing partial enforcement in the interim. In short, a person from the list of nations in the executive order who doesn’t have a “bona fide” relationship with someone in the United States is going to be denied entry.

The Department of Homeland Security offered thanks to the high court for allowing them to enforce the law and protect national security:

The Supreme Court today has allowed the Department of Homeland Security to largely implement the President's Executive Order and take rational and necessary steps to protect our nation from persons looking to enter and potentially do harm. The granting of a partial stay of the circuit injunctions with regard to many aliens abroad restores to the Executive Branch crucial and long-held constitutional authority to defend our national borders.

The Department will provide additional details on implementation after consultation with the Departments of Justice and State. The implementation of the Executive Order will be done professionally, with clear and sufficient public notice, particularly to potentially affected travelers, and in coordination with partners in the travel industry.
Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement