Kamala Harris' Answer to This Question Should Warrant a Special Counsel Investigation
The NY Times Plagiarism Expert Steals Its Thunder, and Public Trust in the...
The Collapse of Kamala Harris
Fox's Bret Baier Pressed Harris, And the Powder-Puff Press Hated It
Why Can't Kamala Answer a Simple Question?
Are Minorities Voting Increasingly Like Normies?
If Based on Merit, the FTC Should Lose PBM Suit
From Restaurant Eject to Generous Tip: JD Vance’s Unexpected Dining Drama
The Death of Sinwar on the First Day of Tabernacles
How Academic Rot Is Killing the Future Job Market
Why the West Wants Israel to Stop Winning
Trump vs. the Celebrities
How Black Voters View Trump
Trump to Headline Catholic Dinner While Kamala Will Send In Pre-Recorded Tape
View Co-Host Accuses Fox News of 'Racism, Sexism' After Kamala Interview
OPINION

A Fool With a Badge is Still a Fool

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

When a would-be assassin shot my Dad, President Ronald Reagan, nobody questioned the fact that the shooter was certifiably nuts.

Authorities recognized that fact and put him in a mental institution as his obvious disturbed mental state demanded.

Advertisement

Now we have another attempted killing of a public official, Arizona's widely admired Rep. Gabby Giffords, and just about everybody recognizes the fact that the shooter, one Jared Loughner, is crazy as a loon.

Moreover, the fact that Loughner is probably nutty as a fruitcake, and perhaps dangerously so, could not have escaped the attention of local law enforcement authorities such as Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, who already had Loughner in his sights yet failed to do anything to prevent Loughner's obviously foreseeable skilling spree.

Yet we don't hear a word of repentance for his failure to foresee what transpired in Tucson last Saturday. Not a word, mainly because Sheriff Dupnik is too busy attacking Rush Limbaugh and other conservatives to turn his rhetoric loose on the shooter.

In Dubnik's twisted logic, Loughner may be a murderer but somehow or other it's all Rush's fault for his unforgivable habit of calling a spade a spade and referring to liberals as being mentally disjointed as the majority of them are.

This kind of ridiculous response to a tragedy is becoming what the French would call de riguer -- the liberal's order of the day when one of their failures to recognize reality results in people getting killed.

Advertisement

As my more plainspoken friends would put it, Dubnik shoulda seen it coming, and he's now trying to obfuscate that fact by striking out at people who had not a single thing to do with Loughner's deadly actions.

"All I can tell you is that teachers and fellow students were concerned about his bizarre behavior in class to the point where some of him (sic) were physically afraid of him," Dupnik admitted to ABC News.

"He was acting in very weird fashion to the point where they had several incidents with him to the point where law enforcement at Pima College got involved and they decided to expel him. And they did."

That should have alerted the Sheriff and compelled him to keep a close eye on the Loughner. Tragically, it didn't, so the killer was free to slaughter some of the Sheriff's constituents without interference from Dubnik.

The Sheriff is now busy trying to distract the public from recognizing his failure to protect his own member of Congress, a highly respected federal judge on his way home from daily Mass, and other innocent people from being attacked by a man he had to know was dangerous, especially when he was allowed to get within point-blank range of the congresswoman.

So in the strange world of Sheriff Dubnik, Rush Limbaugh's use of his freedom of speech in warning against the destructive policies of liberalism is "irresponsible," while his own poisoned rhetoric is permissible.

Advertisement

Incredibly, Dubnik has suggested that Uncle Sam put a gag on Americans by setting up a Goebbels-like "kind of commission" that would apparently "deal with civility and make recommendations on how to get it back."

That's apparently his view of what freedom of speech means -- freedom to have it regulated by Big Brother. Yet he insists he has nothing against what he called "heated arguments."

There's one consolation for having to put up with the rants and ravings of possibly senile public officials, and that is the fact that this guy is an elected official and the public can dump him if he stands for re-election. At that time they will have an opportunity to replace him with a new sheriff more like his colleague, fellow Arizona lawman Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos