I'm Stunned USA Today Published This Op-Ed From a Dem About Trump's State...
DHS Slaps Down Baltimore Sun Over Fake News About Recent ICE Arrest
Top Baton Rouge Aide Indicted for Stealing Taxpayer Funds in 'Kickback' Scheme
This Is What Marco Rubio Said When Asked About North Korea
Baltimore Mayor Tried to Stop Watchdog Investigation – Now He's Facing a Lawsuit
CA Judge Steps in Allowing 20,000 Illegal Alien Truck Drivers to Remain on...
The State of the Union – A Win Is a Win
Democrats Smell Blood in Texas, but Republicans Are Ready
The Media Once Scolded Us for Using a Certain Label They Now Love
Illegal Alien Hurt Three Kids While Evading Arrest. Guess Who the Mayor Blames.
California Dems Took Nearly $1B From a Solar Panel Project to Build a...
Vice President Vance Destroyed Tony Evers for Refusing to Help Clean Up Fraud...
Here's How Mamdani's Snow Shoveling Program is Going
Steve Hilton's CalDOGE Says It Uncovered Over $900M in State Fraud in Second...
Gavin Newsom Reveals Which Potential Heir to the MAGA Movement 'Scares' Him The...
OPINION

Exposing Media Bias Is a 'Bad Faith' Argument?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Exposing Media Bias Is a 'Bad Faith' Argument?
Photo by Evan Agostini/Invision/AP

The arrogance of the liberal media can be measured by their dismissal of all conservative criticism as "bad faith" attacks on the press. Assuming that conservative critics are dishonest and disreputable cynics is a common trope of CNN's Brian Stelter when liberal journalists become mired in scandal.

Advertisement

In a June 15 "Academic Minute" podcast, Marist College professor Kevin Lerner explicitly defined the entire conservative movement as bad-faith media critics.

"These bad-faith attacks on the press began to rise most recently in the 1960s and '70s, led by a concerted effort among conservative journalists and critics," Lerner argued. "Along with efforts to create a conservative counterbalance to the mainstream press, they engaged in attempts to delegitimize legacy news organizations by painting them as irredeemably biased. This strain of bad-faith criticism is alive and well today."

"Good-faith" criticism, he insisted, is "based on the premise that a strong, independent press, responsive to the needs of an engaged citizenry, is essential to the functioning of a democratic society."

There are several obvious flaws in this argument.

First, conservatives don't see "legacy news organizations" as "independent." They are not watchdogs of both parties. They are savage destroyers of one party and cuddly defenders of the other. They are not "responsive to the needs" of all citizens but to the political needs of one party. This argument is somehow in "bad faith," regardless of the evidence.

Second, conservatives dare to argue that the "press" is not synonymous with the "mainstream press." Lerner's side always implies that there is not a liberal media and conservative media, but a mainstream media and an extreme media.

Advertisement

Related:

CONSERVATISM

Third, criticizing liberal news organizations is part of the "functioning of a democratic society." We want a vibrant press, but media criticism is not anti-democracy. It defines democracy. Liberals like Lerner believe that democracy functions best when "legacy media" never lose public trust, no matter what kind of partisan hackery they foist on the public.

Take the recent network coverage of voting-integrity laws, which the Democrats despise, and -- surprise! -- so do the "strong and independent" networks.

Rich Noyes of the Media Research Center studied ABC, CBS and NBC evening news coverage from March 1 through June 10 and identified nearly 52 minutes of airtime spent on Republican-sponsored state election laws. That compares to just 2 minutes and 40 seconds for the Democrat-sponsored federal legislation called the For the People Act.

Then there's the tone of this "news" reporting. Taking into account statements from reporters, anchors and non-aligned sources (soundbites from voters and experts), but excluding identified Democrats and Republicans, Noyes found just three positive comments about the Republican-sponsored laws, versus 75 negative statements.

It was routine to categorize these laws as a conspiracy to "restrict voting access." Some of these reporters could be described as "delegitimizing" the Republicans. "It's the new election law that many tonight are calling racist," ABC's Steve Osunsami said about the Georgia law on March 26. "Black and brown voters are screaming that this is voter suppression."

Advertisement

That "screaming" is treated not as one side of the argument but as the Right Side of History, the heroic forces organizing for democracy and against "systemic racism."

Liberals imagine that "legacy news organizations" must never be "delegitimized" by calling them partisan, even as these "news" people seek to delegitimize every politician and critic they want to defeat. Their "independent press" has sought to delegitimize the Republicans, the police, our border guards, our military, our national anthem, even the "triggering" flag.

But liberals insist you must never delegitimize their media strongholds. You must never undermine the underminers.

Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement