Nick Shirley's Latest Fraud Video Is Another Gold Mine
Wait, That Cannot Be James Talarico's Latest Voter Outreach Strategy?
Graham Platner's Top Aide Is Now DSA's Public Enemy Number One
Sportscaster Dan Patrick Cannot Believe the WNBA Commissioner Bailed on Him
So, That's Why the Trump Administration Subpoenaed Some NYT Reporters
Man Who Accused Hunter Biden of $800M Iran Bribery Scheme Now Owes Him...
No Still Means No
Is AI Leading to a Dumbed-Down and Misled Populace?
The Inhumanity of Surrogacy
DOJ Opens Investigation Into Texas Police Department Who Threatened Street Preacher With A...
The State Department Just Canceled a Baffling Meeting Between a Mamdani-Aide and Iran
This Democrat's Reaction to the Houston ICE Self-Defense Shooting Was Hilariously Dumb
DHS Creates 'Deportation Airline' to Carry-Out 24/7 Deportation Flights
The Narrative Wars
A Filmmaker’s Journey Into Artificial Intelligence
Tipsheet

Court Rules in Favor of Ground Zero Cross, Rejects Atheists' Appeal

Court Rules in Favor of Ground Zero Cross, Rejects Atheists' Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that the 17-foot cross beam salvaged from the wreckage of Twin Towers will remain in the National 9/11 Museum, despite the very best efforts of American Atheists Inc.

Advertisement

In “American Atheists v. Port Authority of New Jersey and New York” the group asserted that the artifact's positioning in the museum towered "over any other symbols in the vicinity, expressing Christian primacy." It charged that the Latin cross's dominance violated the First Amendment Establishment Clause and the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution.

The judges found, however, that the "Ground Zero Cross" is a constitutional and an important symbolic artifact from the terrorist attack. According to the ruling:

"The stated purpose of displaying The Cross at Ground Zero to tell the story of how some people used faith to cope with the tragedy is genuine, and an objective observer would understand the purpose of the display to be secular...there is no evidence that the static display of this genuine historic artifact excessively entangles the government with religion."
Advertisement

This common sense ruling still comes as a major legal victory. Eric Baxter, Counsel for the Beckett Fund, noted that the court made a very key distinction:

“Even though the Ground Zero Cross is unquestionably a religious symbol, and holds deep religious meaning for many people—particularly those who found hope and inspiration in its discovery—the government does not violate the Establishment Clause by recognizing and educating others about the actual role played by religion in our history and culture.”

This historic relic will now continue to show the importance of religion in the United States for years to come.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement