We May Have Some Trouble in South Carolina Over Redistricting
Guess Who Else Is Launching Airstrikes Against Iran
Kevin Warsh Is One Step Closer to Becoming the Next Fed Chair
‘The View’ Is a Cancer on the Culture and the Country
There's Plenty of Gerrymandering Meandering Going on in the Press
Jack Carr’s 'The Fourth Option' and the Return of the American Gunslinger
When the Pope Isn't Right
Living in the Rearview Mirror
Democratic Socialist Morons Have Money and Momentum
Why Modern Parents Prefer Goofy Baby Names
Iran's Crumbling Dictatorship Faces Its Final Reckoning
The Fall of Virginia’s Icarus
Where's the Justice For Victims of Violent Crime?
Career Criminal Goes on Shooting Spree in Massachusetts
This Democrat Mayor Just Came Clean About Working For Communist China
Tipsheet

Did You See the Indicted Wisconsin Judge's Defense?

Did You See the Indicted Wisconsin Judge's Defense?
AP Photo/Devi Shastri

Judge Hannah Dugan, the Milwaukee judge who was arrested last month after she allegedly hid an illegal immigrant in her courthouse, was indicted by a grand jury earlier this week. She's still in the news, though, given the laughable defense she's come up with. In covering Dugan's defense, Bonchie at our sister site aptly pointed out that what her lawyers are arguing "Will Crack You Up."

Advertisement

As WISN, a local ABC News outlet covered:

A day after a grand jury indicted Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan and her attorney are asking that her federal charges be dismissed, arguing the charges are unconstitutional, citing her judicial immunity and the Tenth Amendment.

...

"The problems with this prosecution are legion, but most immediately, the government cannot prosecute Judge Dugan because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts," her attorneys argued in the motion.

Dugan is accused of helping an undocumented immigrant evade federal immigration officials after appearing in her courtroom.

Dugan was not acting in her official capacity, though. Judicial immunity ought not to apply. If it turns out she is guilty, she was almost certainly abusing her power as a judge, and it looks like she's further standing by that with such a legal defense. 

Professor Jonathan Turley shared with Fox News that he doesn't see a use for such a legal theory. 

Just as it was worth doing at the time when Dugan was first arrested, it's worth issuing a key reminder to those who have been clamoring to defend the judge while ranting and raving about the Trump administration. Many of these same people were quick to tell you that nobody is above the law. 

Advertisement

Related:

RULE OF LAW

Turley also put out a blog post about Dugan's indictment, reminding how Democrats fawned over her and her alleged crimes. 

Dugan faces up to six years in prison and a maximum fine of up to $350,000 if she's found guilty. She entered a "not guilty" plea earlier on Thursday. A trial date has been set for July 21. 

Editor's Note: Every single day, here at Townhall, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its major wins. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement