The Scott Pelley Saga Is Over at CBS News, but Not the Melodramatics...
New 'American Options Doctrine' Would Transform US-Israel Relations
The Associated Press Is Married to Protecting Islam at Any Cost
Scott Pelley and Bari Weiss Respond to Pelley's Termination From CBS
You Just Thought You Hated HOAs Before
California’s New Congressional Map May Have Just Backfired on Gavin Newsom
This Democrat Just Stormed Out of Marco Rubio's House Hearing
Michigan Rapper Sentenced to 10 Years for $63M Mail Theft Scheme
Two Foreign NIH Researchers Charged With Smuggling Monkeypox Into U.S.
USDA Finds $13.3 Million in Potential Ohio SNAP Fraud
'Reconciliation 3.0' Is Almost Here – And It Might Include the SAVE America Act
Four Republicans Join Democrats As U.S. House Passes Iran War Powers Resolution
Detransitioner Chloe Cole Testifies on Devastating Effects of Transition
Kansas Woman Sentenced for $450K Benefits Fraud Using Dead Relative’s Identity
Yes, People Still Voted for Eric Swalwell
Tipsheet

House Ethics Committee Makes Decision Regarding Jamaal Bowman Pulling Fire Alarm

House Ethics Committee Makes Decision Regarding Jamaal Bowman Pulling Fire Alarm
AP Photo/John Minchillo

On Wednesday, the House Ethics Committee voted against opening an investigation or a report into Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY), who, on September 30, pulled the fire alarm while the House was voting to avert a government shutdown. Doing so is a violation of the DC code, and Bowman was charged by the DC Attorney General and pled guilty last month. 

Advertisement

The Department of Justice (DOJ) declined to charge Bowman for "obstructing an official proceeding," despite how the congressman pulling the fire alarm when there was no such emergency disrupted the vote. Democrats had been complaining about a supposed lack of time to read the bill, though it ended up passing with a bipartisan vote.

A brief November 22 letter notes that the Committee's rules require a majority vote in favor of an Investigative Subcommittee (ISC) or a report. "A majority of the Members of the Committee did not agree to establish an ISC or report to the House regarding Bowman's conduct."

The Democratic members on the committee almost certainly voted against opening an investigation into Bowman. It would appear then that Bowman's fellow Democrats have bought his bogus talking points. The Squad member has been seeking to distract from his crime and instead cast blame on Republicans, with a lot of focus on January 6. Earlier talking points from his office, not long after he pulled the alarm, landed him in hot water and forced him to issue a clarification after those "suggested talking points" mentioned "Nazi" without his "consent." 

Advertisement

Related:

SQUAD

"I believe Congressman Bowman when he says this was an accident. Republicans need to instead focus their energy on the Nazi members of their party before anything else," one of those talking points read. 

Bowman has also been in the news quite a bit recently for his take on the Israel-Hamas war, not just when it comes to calling for a ceasefire, but by claiming to do so is "what it actually means to be Jewish." Bowman himself is not Jewish. At the same event he attended and spoke at with other Squad members in support of a ceasefire, Bowman also lamented how rabbis in his district wrote a letter against him for demanding a ceasefire. A ceasefire is to Hamas' benefit. Hamas also broke a ceasefire when they perpetrated a terrorist attack against Israel on October 7.

Guy also highlighted even more outrageous takes from Bowman in his piece from earlier on Wednesday, from voting against condemning Hamas as a terrorist organization, to complaining even further about security in Israel, with claims that he had to walk through certain checkpoints in the West Bank since he's not Jewish. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos