During Wednesday's House Oversight Hearing with IRS whistleblowers, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) ruffled some feathers as she held up a poster board displaying sexually explicit images of Hunter Biden from his abandoned laptop. The images, blurred in the clip below, clearly show prostitutes performing sex acts on Hunter. Greene didn't merely show the images for shock value, but to ask Joseph Ziegler, one of the whistleblowers, about how transporting these women across state lines for prostitution could violate the Mann Act. Many who criticized Greene's tactics appeared to only be able to see the shock value factor.
Watch Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene's questioning of IRS Whistleblowers which began with a "parental discretion" warning. pic.twitter.com/BtFDOdiIDM
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) July 19, 2023
Among them included Arthur Delaney, writing for HuffPost, his headline reading "Marjorie Taylor Greene Shows Photos Of Naked Hunter Biden At IRS Whistleblower Hearing." The subheadline went on to claim that "Greene made a mockery of what was supposed to be a sober examination of political favoritism in the Justice Department." It was included in the Thursday morning edition of RealClearPolitics.
From Delaney's article, though, one would never actually know that Greene asked about the Mann Act. Sarah, in her coverage of the exchange from Wednesday, did include discussion of the Mann Act:
Greene also questioned the Mann Act, which criminalizes the transportation of women across state lines for the sole purpose of prostitution.
“I would like to present this to the committee. This shows Hunter Biden paying for a victim’s United [Airlines] flight from LA to Dulles,” Greene said, holding up evidence. “I believe this is a violation of the Mann Act. He bought it for this woman right here. He flew her from Los Angeles to Washington on June 14th and flew her back to Los Angeles, California on June 15th of 2018.”
Ziegler said that he couldn’t personally talk about the act but could turn over compelling information that would justify Mann Act violations to the House Ways and Means Committee, which Greene could then request.
Recommended
Democratic members on the Committee were among those who don't want the images to be seen. One member can be heard complaining the images are "unbecoming." Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD) questioned "should we be displaying this, Mr. Chairman?"
Delaney in writing about Raskin's concerns left out further context in that time had expired, with Comer promising to "make it right" to Democratic members along the way during the rest of the hearing.
In addressing to a point of order from Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY)--who had a memorable exchange of his own during Wednesday's hearing--Comer explained that the "suspicious activity report has been public for years," emphasizing it "has already been publicized."
Greene is also protected by the Speech and Debate Clause.
Providing selective context is not the only poor take. As our friends at Twitchy higlighted, Jack Cocchiarella, always one for hot takes, suggested that Hunter Biden actually sue the congresswoman for sharing images from the laptop he had abandoned.
Hunter Biden should sue Marjorie Taylor Greene for what she just did on the House floor. pic.twitter.com/E0bZc83hfz
— Jack Cocchiarella (@JDCocchiarella) July 19, 2023
Bad Legal Takes also uncovered how one person, Jennifer Grady, claimed Greene should be arrested. Grady has further tweeted her outrage against Greene.
— Bad Legal Takes (@BadLegalTakes) July 20, 2023
So here MTG admits that she willingly published pornographic images on the House Floor, images that were not given to her by those depicted, and by doing so committed a felony in D.C., a law that Congress approved. #ArrestMTG https://t.co/qWWFx7WdLC
— Jennifer Grady (@jenngradybklyn) July 20, 2023
Nobody elected Hunter Biden to any damn thing. Why does this woman sit in Congress using the American Taxpayer's money to push out this b.s. true or false? This is none of our business. WTF is going on in Congress? https://t.co/qffC68aTLK
— Jennifer Grady (@jenngradybklyn) July 19, 2023
Grady, along with Blue Missouri's Jess Piper, tweeted claims that the photos were illegal because they constituted "revenge porn."
Isn’t revenge porn illegal? Why is MTG displaying nude photos on the House floor without consequence?
— Jess Piper (@piper4missouri) July 19, 2023
What she did at the hearing and this email is NOT covered by the Constitution. Revenge Porn is a crime of criminal nature not civil. #ArrrestMTG
— Jennifer Grady (@jenngradybklyn) July 20, 2023
It does not cover this. It did not cover what she did on the House Floor today. Now it IS a crime on two counts under D.C.'s revenge porn laws authorized by Congress.
— Jennifer Grady (@jenngradybklyn) July 20, 2023
But perhaps the most outrageous narrative came from Charlotte Clymer, a biological man who lambasts Republican efforts to protect school children from indoctrination and graphic images like those seen in books such as "Gender Queer." In this specific tweet, Clymer lamented how "these people have the audacity to claim they're trying to 'protect kids' from inappropriate material.
Clymber's tweet conveniently left out how Greene actually did provide a warning for graphic content at the beginning of her time.
Today, Marjorie Taylor Greene displayed, without warning, nude photos of adults during a televised congressional briefing, and these people have the audacity to claim they’re trying to “protect kids” from inappropriate material. https://t.co/PFeKIIYhw6
— Charlotte Clymer 🇺🇦 (@cmclymer) July 19, 2023
Through several tweets, Dana Loesch sought to set the record straight for those throwing such a fit.
For all the people mad that MTG showed Hunter Biden's naughty photos at the hearing, they weren't any different from the images in the books that the left is demanding kids read in school so get over it.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) July 19, 2023
You should probably read more before commenting. https://t.co/zW014KykVk
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) July 20, 2023
We cannot embed other tweets from Loesch, as they contained graphic images from books made available to school children, due to the explicit content. It's worth emphasizing, though, that school children have access to these books, and that those who try to protect them from such adult material are smeared and maligned.
Earlier this week, as Townhall covered, a New Jersey public library moved one of those graphic books, "Gender Queer," to the adult shelves, prompting swift and ignorant backlash, including from the likes of the ACLU and former President Barack Obama.
David Harasanyi, in a column published last month in Townhall, called on liberals, including those at the Biden White House, who are crying about such "book bans" to read them aloud.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member