Jim Jordan Gets Jack Smith to Admit How Far He Was Willing to...
Don Lemon Walks Free While Someone Else Takes the Fall in Church Protest...
Iran's Struggle for Freedom: An Expert's Inside Look
Trump Names the Republicans He Trusts With His Legacy in Interview With Katie...
America's Murder Rate Plummeted in 2025 and No One Can Fully Explain It
Watch This Democrat Lawmaker Make a Fool of Himself Defending Jack Smith
Nick Shirley Gave Opening Remarks at the House Judiciary Committee Hearing on Fraud....
DHS: Palestinian Activist Mahmoud Khalil Will Be Rearrested and Deported to Algeria
Jacob Frey Doesn't Seem to Care That He's Under DOJ Investigation for Impeding...
On the Anniversary of Roe, Democrats Promise to Keep Harming Women
Sunny Hostin Wants Criminal Illegal Immigrants to Sue President Trump for Defamation
Alleged Minneapolis Church Mob Ringleader Went on CNN Last Night. Here's What She...
DHS Slams Democrat Story Which Claims ICE Used 5-Year-Old as Bait
The Trump Administration Is Actively Seeking Regime Change in Cuba by the End...
President Trump Formally Charters the Board of Peace in Davos As His Gaza...
Tipsheet

Biden Claims It Was 'Not My Intent' to Imply Veto of Infrastructure Bill, So What the Heck Was the Intent?

AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

It's been a hectic week with that infrastructure bill. Just a few short hours after President Joe Biden appeared at a press conference with senators from all sides of the aisle to announce the deal, he signaled he was tying what was supposed to be a bipartisan infrastructure bill with the partisan budget reconciliation, which Reagan and I both covered. 

Advertisement

Now, however, he appears to be changing his tune. On Saturday afternoon, the White released a "Statement by President Joe Biden on the Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework."

The statement in part read:

At a press conference after announcing the bipartisan agreement, I indicated that I would refuse to sign the infrastructure bill if it was sent to me without my Families Plan and other priorities, including clean energy. That statement understandably upset some Republicans, who do not see the two plans as linked; they are hoping to defeat my Families Plan—and do not want their support for the infrastructure plan to be seen as aiding passage of the Families Plan. My comments also created the impression that I was issuing a veto threat on the very plan I had just agreed to, which was certainly not my intent.

...

Some other Democrats have said they might oppose the Infrastructure Plan because it omits items they think are important: that is a mistake, in my view. Some Republicans now say that they might oppose the infrastructure plan because I am also trying to pass the American Families Plan: that is also a mistake, in my view. I intend to work hard to get both of them passed, because our country needs both—and I ran a winning campaign for President that promised to deliver on both. No one should be surprised that that is precisely what I am doing.

I will ask Leader Schumer to schedule both the infrastructure plan and the reconciliation bill for action in the Senate. I expect both to go to the House, where I will work with Speaker Pelosi on the path forward after Senate action. Ultimately, I am confident that Congress will get both to my desk, so I can sign each bill promptly.

Advertisement

The statement is full of the president patting himself on the back as well as him slamming Republicans. In trying to sell the American Families Plan, Biden claimed it "has broad support with the American people, but not among Republicans in Congress."

Nobody can blame those who reacted to the news that Biden was tying legislation together, especially since Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said the same thing. If this wasn't what Biden was implying, what was he implying, then?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos