Time To Make Democrats Choke On A Big Dose Of Their Own Medicine
This Man Was Exonerated After Being Falsely Convicted for Murder. This DA Wants...
Tomb, Triumph, and Trump: The Resurrection Power Behind a Free Republic
Awake (Not Woke) to Righteousness
Making a Deal With Iran Would Be a Catastrophic Mistake
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 264: Resurrection Evidence? Shroud.com Interview With Editor Joe...
Legacy Media Bias for All to See
Faith and Reason
California Says Grammar Lessons and Easter-Themed Legos Are Just Too Religious
Easter: the Resurrection of Jesus Transformed the World Forever
Nate Silver Predicts 2028 Democrat Presidential Nominee-- It's Worse Than Kamala Harris
Putin Announces Temporary Easter Truce In War With Ukraine
Trump Administration Starts Pulling Hundreds of Troops from Syria
LeBron James Cashed In: $50K Harris Paycheck Exposes Sham Celebrity Endorsements
Hillary Clinton Defends Alleged MS-13 Gang Member Abrego Garcia
Tipsheet

Court Rules That a Fetus Can Be Referred to As ‘Unborn Human Being’ in This State’s Voter Pamphlet

AP Photo/Rebecca Santana

The Arizona Supreme Court will allow an informational pamphlet for voters to refer to an embryo or fetus as an “unborn human being.”

Voters in the Grand Canyon state will decide on a constitutional right to abortion this fall. 

Advertisement

According to ABC News, the high court sided with Republican lawmakers who created the language sent to all voters in the state about the proposed amendment. 

Predictably, pro-abortion advocates argued that the phrase “unborn human being” is not impartial or objective. These words, they argued, are biased and politically charged, ABC News noted. 

“We are deeply disappointed in this ruling, but will not be deterred from doing everything in our power to communicate to voters the truth of the Arizona Abortion Access Act and why it’s critical to vote YES to restore and protect access to abortion care this fall,” a left-wing group called Arizona for Abortion Access, said in a statement.

While pro-abortion advocates remain “deeply disappointed” that unborn children will be referred to as such, Arizona Republicans celebrated the court’s decision. 

“The Arizona Supreme Court’s ruling is correct,” Arizona House Speaker Ben Toma (R) said (via ABC News):

The brief ruling, signed by Vice Chief Justice John Lopez, did not explain the justices’ rationale, saying a full opinion would be released later. Justice Clint Bolick, whose wife is a Republican lawmaker on the legislative council, recused himself from the case.

Last month, Townhall covered how Arkansas Secretary of State John Thurston rejected the effort put forward by pro-abortion activists to enshrine the right to kill your unborn baby into state law. 

Advertisement

Thurston said that the pro-abortion group behind the measure failed to submit a sworn statement both identifying paid canvassers by name and confirming that these canvassers were properly trained on collecting signatures. Due to this, the initiative was disqualified.

Since pro-abortion activists will stop at nothing to continue their push to kill unborn babies, the group sued the state

“We will fight this ridiculous disqualification attempt with everything we have,” the group said. “We will not back down.”

In response, Attorney General Tim Griffin said, “As I have long said, changing the Arkansas Constitution involves a rigorous process, as it should, and it requires sponsors to adhere to all applicable laws and rules.” 

“Failure to follow such a basic requirement is inexcusable: the abortion advocates have no one to blame but themselves.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement