John Thune Fumes After Getting Roasted by Karoline Leavitt Over His Incompetence
Oh, So That Explains These Wild Paragraphs About Caitlin Clark in That USA...
The Left-Wing Unicorn Hunt for the White Male Working-Class Voter
WisDems File a Lawsuit to Allow Absentee Voters to Cast a New Ballot
More Evidence How Facts Are Not Proof for the Press; Caitlin Clark's Fouls...
There's a Hidden Left-Wing Network Powering the 'Conservative' Rebellion Against Data Cent...
The Opposite of Diversity Is University
Mamdani Makes It Clear He Believes International Law Trumps US Sovereignty
The AP Blames US Aid Cuts for the Plight of Trans Sex Workers...
Trump: Iran Will Pay for Ship Damage With Its Own Frozen Funds
Massachusetts Woman Charged in $10 Million Ponzi Scheme That Burned 200 Investors
Trump Cracks Jokes, Reveals 'Little Bet' During Dodgers White House Visit
Oklahoma Chiropractor Convicted in $30 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme
Spanberger's Virginia Allowed Another Illegal Alien to Assault and Murder a Child
Mexican National Sentenced for Orchestrating Fake Robberies to Score U-Visas
Tipsheet

This State Is Being Sued for Rejecting a Pro-Abortion Ballot Initiative

This State Is Being Sued for Rejecting a Pro-Abortion Ballot Initiative
AP Photo/Evan Vucci

Pro-abortion supporters are suing the state of Arkansas after the secretary of state rejected an extreme ballot measure last week. 

As Townhall covered, the Arkansas Secretary of State John Thurston rejected the effort put forward by pro-abortion activists to enshrine the right to kill your unborn baby into state law. 

Advertisement

Thurston said that the group failed to submit a sworn statement both identifying paid canvassers by name and confirming that these canvassers were properly trained on collecting signatures, according to The New York Times. Due to this, the initiative was disqualified.

“The first part of our review is to ensure that the sponsor has complied with all statutory requirements for submitting a petition,” Thurston wrote. “Because you failed at this first step, it is my duty to reject your submission.”

Now, a group called Arkansans for Limited Government asked the state Supreme Court to reverse the state’s decision to reject the ballot measure. The organization asked the court to order the state to begin counting its signatures. 

The law these activists want enshrined in the state would prohibit abortion restrictions in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. And, it would allow abortions in cases of rape, incest, life of the mother, and if the baby is “unlikely to survive birth,” K8 reported.

Advertisement

Related:

ABORTION

Last week, in a statement, the group that submitted the information needed to qualify for the ballot and said that Thurston’s decision was “an unfounded legal interpretation.”

“We will fight this ridiculous disqualification attempt with everything we have,” the group said. “We will not back down.”

In response, Attorney General Tim Griffin said, “As I have long said, changing the Arkansas Constitution involves a rigorous process, as it should, and it requires sponsors to adhere to all applicable laws and rules.” 

“Failure to follow such a basic requirement is inexcusable: the abortion advocates have no one to blame but themselves.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement