Conservatives for Property Rights Urge White House Support for Patent Reform
Where's the Left's Outrage Over This Florida Shooting?
From Madison to Minneapolis: One Leftist's Mission to Stop ICE
Two Wisconsin Hospitals Halted 'Gender-Affirming Care' for Minors, but the Fight Isn't Ove...
Dilbert Creator Scott Adams Has Died at 68
Here's the Insane Reason a U.K. Asylum Seeker Was Spared Jail Despite Sex...
Trump to Iran: Help Is on the Way
Trump’s Leverage Doctrine
Stop Pretending That Colleges Are Nonprofit Institutions
Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on Whether States Can Ban Men From Women’s...
Federal Reserve Chairman ‘Ignored’ DOJ, Pirro Says, Necessitating Criminal Probe
Iran Death Toll Tops 12,000 As Security Forces Begin to Slaughter Non-Protesting Civilians
If Bill Clinton Thought He Could Just Not Show Up for His House...
The December Inflation Report Is Here, and It's Good News
The GOP Is Restoring the American Dream of Homeownership
Tipsheet

This State Is Being Sued for Rejecting a Pro-Abortion Ballot Initiative

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

Pro-abortion supporters are suing the state of Arkansas after the secretary of state rejected an extreme ballot measure last week. 

As Townhall covered, the Arkansas Secretary of State John Thurston rejected the effort put forward by pro-abortion activists to enshrine the right to kill your unborn baby into state law. 

Advertisement

Thurston said that the group failed to submit a sworn statement both identifying paid canvassers by name and confirming that these canvassers were properly trained on collecting signatures, according to The New York Times. Due to this, the initiative was disqualified.

“The first part of our review is to ensure that the sponsor has complied with all statutory requirements for submitting a petition,” Thurston wrote. “Because you failed at this first step, it is my duty to reject your submission.”

Now, a group called Arkansans for Limited Government asked the state Supreme Court to reverse the state’s decision to reject the ballot measure. The organization asked the court to order the state to begin counting its signatures. 

The law these activists want enshrined in the state would prohibit abortion restrictions in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. And, it would allow abortions in cases of rape, incest, life of the mother, and if the baby is “unlikely to survive birth,” K8 reported.

Advertisement

Related:

ABORTION

Last week, in a statement, the group that submitted the information needed to qualify for the ballot and said that Thurston’s decision was “an unfounded legal interpretation.”

“We will fight this ridiculous disqualification attempt with everything we have,” the group said. “We will not back down.”

In response, Attorney General Tim Griffin said, “As I have long said, changing the Arkansas Constitution involves a rigorous process, as it should, and it requires sponsors to adhere to all applicable laws and rules.” 

“Failure to follow such a basic requirement is inexcusable: the abortion advocates have no one to blame but themselves.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos