Joe Scarborough Really Stretched the Limits of Sanity With This Take on the...
Fiasco: NYC GOP Councilwoman Just Obliterated Mamdani Over the City's Shambolic Winter Sto...
CBS News Peddled Fake News About Bad Bunny and ICE Post-Super Bowl Performance
Yes, This Was the Best Response to John Kasich's Tweet About the Super...
Jasmine Crockett Shows Just How Low Democrats Are Willing to Go to Attack...
Dozens of Detransitioners Have Filed Lawsuits, and the Costs Could End 'Gender-Affirming C...
While Homeless New Yorkers Freeze, the NYT Wants Us to Know This About...
Sen. Warren Repeats Debunked Lie About Women and the SAVE Act
We Must Not Submit to 'Diversity'
A Maryland Squatter Walks Free — and Here's What Her Attorney Had...
AWFUL Who Harassed Yoga Studio Employees Over ICE Earned Herself a Ban
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
Trump Targets Obama’s Climate 'Endangerment Finding' in Sweeping Rollback of Emissions Rul...
Steve Hilton Isn’t Even Governor Yet, and He’s Already Exposing California Welfare Fraud
Tipsheet

Sigh: Here's Why WaPo's 'Kevin McCarthy Once Said Trump Was On Putin's Payroll!' Scoop is Dumb

In a week of significant bombshells dropping every evening, this one is a dud. The Washington Post has obtained a recording of House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy telling colleagues last year that he believed Donald Trump -- by then the presumptive GOP presidential nominee -- was on the payroll of Russian President Vladimir Putin. The Post calls it an "explosive assertion," but is that a remotely fair characterization? Color me highly skeptical. Buried deep in the story is a transcript of the exchange, which reads very much like joking banter, replete with multiple references to laughter:

Advertisement


Liberals who pounced on this story seem especially invested in two details: First, that a spokesman for Paul Ryan "lied" by denying that the conversation had ever taken place, only reversing course after he was told there was a recording of it.  And second, that Ryan urged his colleagues not to leak that nugget after the laughter subsided. Obvious explanations for both immediately spring to mind. For instance, perhaps a Congressional aide might forget about a fleeting chuckle-fest, and would instinctively deny that the House Majority Leader had seriously alleged that Trump is a Russian agent.  Ding, ding, ding:


Gee, and why might Paul Ryan have admonished members that the joke had been made in an off-the-record setting (drawing additional laughter)? Perhaps because he knew that the GOP was already going to struggle to heal over Trump's nomination, and that an out-of-context leak about a Republican leader "attacking" Trump could be blown out of proportion by an unserious and hysterical media. It would seem as though the Speaker's concerns were justified, wouldn't it?  Here's NBC News grilling McCarthy, who seems bemused and incredulous that this is even a real thing:

Advertisement


The transcript mentions multiple rounds of laughter as the back-and-forth unfolds. The Post's reporters say they listened to and verified the tape, so I'll leave you with a crazy idea: How about releasing it to the public so we can judge the tone and context for ourselves, rather than being breathlessly informed about "explosive assertions"?  C'mon.  There's lots of real news this week, guys.  Cover it.

UPDATE - As I was saying...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos