Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.
She sure looks to have pretty good genes, too, but that's not important. What's important is that an ad for denim has become the center of a firestorm because the words "jeans" and "genes" are pronounced the same, and so some people absolutely lost their minds over the ad and are crying "Nazi!"
Again.
Because they don't know another word, I guess.
Now, Sweeney is an attractive young woman. That she can also shoot guns pretty well and likes to fix vintage cars makes her pretty hot in my book, but that's just me. Some people don't think she's as pretty as others, which is fine. I'll make fun of those people, of course, but they really are entitled to their opinions.
But the braying donkeys that make up the left are screaming, and I find it amusing considering what all we've been told by them.
For example, Dylan Mulvaney is a girl, Lizzo is gorgeous, and Hunter Schafer – a model and trans activist – was the only choice to play an actual female Zelda in the upcoming "Legend of Zelda" movie.
And there's so much more.
Supposed bioethicists want to infect humanity with a disease that can cause death in some instances, just so the world will be more moral and not eat meat. That's right, it's moral to put lives at risk and make people violently sick if they consume meat, all so we'll conform to their idea of right and wrong, despite that being far from a universally agreed-upon position.
The side that screams about "trusting the science" can't decide what a woman is and claims there's no link between obesity and heart disease, even as "fat acceptance" advocates die at incredibly young ages, but they want to infect you with a potentially life-threatening disease because they're convinced "meat is murder."
Of course, since they also can't seem to explain why every climate change model to date has failed to come close to accurately predicting anything, this shouldn't be surprising.
See, what we need to understand is that to your garden-variety leftist, there is no objective truth. Everything is subjective in some manner, which is why they claim things like "violent crime is a social construct," or that race is one, too. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but if you think an obese woman prancing around a stage in a super-tight onesie isn't beautiful, you're a bigot. If you think that the attractive, blue-eyed, blonde actress in the jeans ad is attractive, you're a fascist, because they've subjectively decided what objective reality would be.
Does that make any sense? Of course not, but tell me it's not true. Tell me honestly that the left doesn't present literally everything they discuss in just that way.
If they want to infect us with a disease to make us allergic to meat, we need to let them because they know what's moral. If they tell you a grossly obese singer is beautiful, you're supposed to accept that because they understand what beauty is. If they want to defecate on a canvas and call it art, who are you to question it?
See, one of the biggest problems we're likely to have in finding anything approaching common ground in this day and age is the fact that so few on the left actually have a grasp of objective reality. They simply dismiss anything inconvenient to their so-called thinking and just make whatever claims make them feel better. It's Calvinball, but expanded beyond the funny pages.
They're trying to gaslight us into believing things that simply aren't true.
We're living inside of an upside-down world, and that's because these shrieking harpies have convinced too many people that objective reality and morality aren't a thing.
It's well past time we tell them to sit down and shut up.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member