Uh, Why Did the Dems Release This Internal Poll for This House Race?...
New York Times Puts Brutal Dictator on Its Fashion List, Then Quietly Deletes...
Skynet Panic or Power Grab? Bipartisan Bill Would Let Government Shut Down AI...
Appeals Court Rejects Trump Administration's Efforts to Re-Detain Researcher Over Israel C...
Ted Cruz Makes Interesting Prediction About Democrats in 2028
‘You’ve Got Mail’: NYC Mayor Taunts Wealthy Homeowners As He Robs Them Blind...
Long Island Residents Object to All-Boys Muslim Boarding School in Their Neighborhood
Freddy, Everyone's Favorite German Tourist, Bids America Farewell
The DNC Has Chosen Which State Will Be the First on the 2028...
This Is Who Mamdani Blamed for NYPD Violence
USA Today Stands by Nancy Armour's Ridiculous Caitlin Clark Column
Here's Why the NYPD Union Is Livid With Mamdani Right Now
Look, If James Carville Says So…
Trump Demands Key 'Reconciliation 3.0' Step Passed Before August Recess
We've Got Details on ICE's Latest Arrests
OPINION

Obama the Rodney Dangerfield of World Leaders

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Obama the Rodney Dangerfield of World Leaders

It's a comparison too obvious to pass up. We all remember the late comedian Rodney Dangerfield, best known for exclaiming, "I get no respect," as he tugged at his collar and bulged his eyes to a laughing audience. You know things are, as Rodney would say, "tough" if his comedy has entered a discussion of foreign policy.

Advertisement

Over the past few weeks, columnists and commentators have struggled to comprehend President Obama's reaction to the situation in Ukraine as well as the more recent "defection" of Crimea into the Russian camp. But the truth is that no one can make any sense of this administration's foreign policy, because, basically, it has no foreign policy. And it has caused President Obama to appear as all too much like the famed comedian, left to shrugging his shoulders over world events.

Consider the fact that Syria has been a simmering caldron for several years. And, yes, most Americans did not want to see military intervention in that nation and likely still don't support such a move. But in the middle of a potentially substantial change in policy and political alignment by the world's other great superpower, the Obama administration chooses now as the appropriate time to kick Syria's diplomatic corps out of the country. All of this as a "symbolic" gesture on the third anniversary of revolt in that nation.

So far, about all the president has done in his years in office has been symbolic. Yes, he hunted down Bin Laden, but that was after years of pursuit by the U.S. To be fair, it shocked some observers that the president would have even participated in the effort, but he did, and in so doing, "symbolically" demonstrated that he could be "tough."

But, to steal from Rodney, if you look up the word "tough" in the dictionary, all you see is a picture of Vladimir Putin. Now that's one tough guy. And while he has promised to limit his nation's expansion to Crimea, he and his minions give every indication that they are gearing up for something much more ambitious.

Advertisement

Related:

RUSSIA

With an American president who is a world famous "community organizer" obsessed with wealth inequality and appealing to an increasingly extreme far left, it probably isn't difficult for Putin, with his KGB background, to have profiled Obama as a weakling from the moment he took office.

And certainly the former KGB psychologists aren't having much difficulty determining that a Secretary of State who, years earlier, turned in his medals and protested a war might not be the toughest of adversaries.

It doesn't take a genius to see where this all ends up. The U.S. president proposes a budget that cuts the military. The Russian leader takes a small piece of territory that once was a part of the former Soviet Union. The U.S. response is to freeze assets that don't really impact Russia.

Then to add "muscle" to its position, the administration supports tossing Russia out of its equivalent of the exclusive "Bushwood Country Club" in Dangerfield's iconic move "Caddyshack," the G-8 (soon to become the G-7). Putin most likely responds, as did Dangerfield's character in the movie, by exclaiming as he is threatened with expulsion from the club that "the only reason I'm here is because I might buy it."

Meanwhile, other small portions of the old Soviet empire start to claim they too want to join Russia. Russia begins to flex its muscle in other ways, such as in a clearly authorized comment by that nation's version of an American network news anchor basically reminding viewers that only Russia could reduce the U.S. to ashes with a launch of nuclear weapons.

Advertisement

Before you know it, Russia and the "West" no longer "trust" each other. Relations get cold. Does that sound familiar?

We will know we are headed back to an early "Cold War" when we start hearing the U.S. and its allies talking in terms of "containing" or "containment."

This White House has played on words, parsed statements, shaken fists, stomped its feet and done everything it could possibly do for almost six years in reaction to potential enemies abroad. All as a ruse for its lack of backbone.

Luckily for Obama, one Dangerfield joke might not apply to him or his administration. It goes like this: "I get no respect. The way my luck is running, if I were a politician, I'd be honest."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement