Trump Says He Got No Warning From Secret Service, Who Admits They Denied...
And We Have Another Brutal Development on the Trump Assassination Attempt
The Idea of Changing Your Mind Confuses Democrats
Republicans Roar Out of Milwaukee Confident of November Victory
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 226: Psalm Summer - Part 3
Grover Cleveland, Long Before Donald Trump
Iran Threat on the Global Stage: Resistance, Elections, and the Western Dilemma
Big Labor Comes for the House
Donald Trump’s Shooter — A Product of Government Schools’ Indoctrination?
JD Vance Will Protect American Workers
Exposing the Lies of Socialism
Vance Should Not Cower From Abortion Controversy
Does Gretchen Whitmer Have What It Takes to be President?
One Week After Trump Was Nearly Assassinated, He Takes the Stage Again
Here’s What Fauci Had to Say About Trump’s Injuries After Would-Be Assassination

Raise a Glass, Not Taxes, On National Beverage Day

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of
AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File

Friday, May 6 is National Beverage Day. The day was borne in the early 20th century and even though a day of celebrating beverages may seem obscure, consumers must beware that New York City billionaire Michael Bloomberg has made it a mission to deter adults from the consumption of certain beverages – including sodas and carbonated drinks. So, celebrate as you can, as a soda tax may be coming to your state or city.


Some of the earliest mentions of the national day date back to 1924 when aMarch article in The Times of Montgomery, Alabama noted that on the “first Wednesday of next May, throughout the United States approximately 12,000 bottlers of these bubbly beverages will celebrate the centennial of their industry.” Reported activities were to include tours of carbonated beverage manufacturing facilities, samples and “public meetings at which speakers will relate the history … and the endorsements … given by U.S. government and state authorities, medical men and food specialists.”

The national day was endorsed by the then-American Bottlers of Carbonated Beverages – now known as the American Beverage Association (ABA) – which used the national day to educate the public on the safety of their products.

The ABA was established in 1919 and is a perfect example of the market addressing flaws and issues related to consumer goods. During the early 1900s, many foods and drinks came under intense scrutiny as the federal government moved to establish a national regulatory agency, which became the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

But, apparently despite a coalition of self-corrective industry members and an increasingly encroaching federal agency, some, like former New York City mayor-turned-so-called-philanthropist Michael R. Bloomberg don’t find that good enough. In fact, through the past decade, Bloomberg has advocated – and funded millions of dollars – towards campaigns to tax consumers of carbonated sugary beverages.


In 2012, after famously attempting to ban large sodas in New York City, Bloomberg set his eye on pushing soda taxes in localities across the country. In 2014, the once presidential candidate spent $675,000 in support of a soda tax in Berkeley, California. In 2016, Bloomberg spent more than $2.1 million campaigning for a tax on sugary beverages in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The same year, the former mayor also donated more than $18 million on soda tax ballot initiatives in other California cities. Bloomberg also spent“more than $10 million”on the infamous Cook County, Illinois soda tax.

Bloomberg didn’t stop with the United States. He also bankrolled other countries’ soda tax measures. In 2013, Bloomberg Philanthropies pushed Mexico’s tax on sugary beverages. Bloomberg’s non-profit Vital Strategies touted in 2017 “[h]elped win passage of a soda tax in South Africa.”

This is deeply troublesome as soda taxes disproportionately impact lower income persons, fail to reduce obesity rates, and disregard efforts by responsible manufacturers to offer alternatives. Moreover, these proposals are overwhelmingly rejected by the persons most affected by these taxes. Lower income Americans are more likely to drink soda than their high income counterparts and have less disposable income to devote to excise taxes.

The only data that shows that soda taxes have reduced consumption and/or obesity rates is very limited and funded by Bloomberg. Needless to say, this data is unreliable.


Consumers in the localities where the taxes have been implemented do not support Bloomberg’s soda tax campaign. During the Cook County soda tax row, one resident said that Bloomberg should “worry about New York and stay out of Illinois politics.” A 2022 poll of Philadelphia Democrats found that persons earning less than $40,000 a year strongly opposed the tax.

Soda taxes also fly in the face of the consumer-driven changes soda manufacturers have made to their products. American beverage companies including the Coca-Cola Company, Keurig Dr Pepper, and PepsiCo have reduced sugar in their beverages, with an estimated 60 percent “of beverages sold have zero sugar.” This reduction in sugar is without a tax in place.

Happy National Beverage Day – enjoy your Coke or zero-sugar carbonated beverage, and consumers beware, a certain meddlesome billionaire wants to tax you for that.

Lindsey Stroud is Director of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance’s Consumer Center.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos