Should the GOP Gamble on the Government Shutdown?
A Reporter Tried Eating at NYC's Finest Establishments Dressed Like John Fetterman
I Bet You We’re Not Better Off Now With So Much Gambling
Government Weaponization, Accountability, And The UAP Question
For the Love of Charlie
Rupert Murdoch: Right From the Start
Hey, Republicans: Don't Forget About Growth and Prosperity
The Real China-III: 'Follow the Sun'
President Biden’s Offshore Wind Policies Make National Lobster Day a Day to Mourn
Statement of Conservative Ideals Rightly Addresses Nation’s Union Problem
How Do We Maintain a Strong America?
We Now Know Who Will Qualify for Second RNC Debate
Why Did Biden Receive His COVID Booster in Private?
A Disturbing Amount of Democrats, Young People Want Government Censorship
Comer Announces Witnesses in First Impeachment Inquiry Hearing

Discrimination Is Not the Issue

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of
Fifty years after the passage of civil rights laws outlawing discrimination based on race, ethnicity and sex, blacks, Hispanics and women still earn less than white men. In many circles, this fact alone reinforces the belief that discrimination is widespread and only greater government intervention will solve the problem.

But might there be other reasons to explain the earnings gap between whites and minorities and between men and women? Yes, according to a provocative new book by economists June O'Neill and Dave O'Neill. "The Declining Importance of Race and Gender in the Labor Market" makes a persuasive argument that factors other than discrimination are to blame.

The O'Neills don't downplay the role of race and sex discrimination in the past. For Southern blacks in particular, the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 had an immediate and salutary effect. The wages of blacks in the South rose significantly in the aftermath. But elsewhere, the wage gap had been narrowing at a fairly rapid rate for 20 years. And anti-discrimination law had little demonstrable effect on the wages of women, though their earnings, too, had been steadily rising.

Blacks, especially black males, saw their earnings go up dramatically in the aftermath of World War II. Indeed, the 1940s was the decade in which the earnings of black men rose fastest -- exceeding the improvement experienced after employment discrimination was outlawed. Much of this rise was attributable to the movement of blacks out of the Deep South, where they were barred from certain jobs and were paid less even when they performed the same jobs as whites. But educational advancement was also a major factor in how blacks began to close the gap with whites.


The differences that persist today, according to the data the O'Neills present, are largely the result of divergent work-related skills between the groups. Most differences in hourly earnings disappear when black and white men with similar years of schooling, work experience and regional residence are compared.

The O'Neills use a rich source of data from the Current Population Survey and the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth to measure these factors, as well as scores from the Armed Forces Qualification Test. In 2008, when schooling, work experience, scores on the AFQT, age, region, hours worked and type of employer were accounted for, black men ages 35 to 43 earned 100 percent of the wages of similar white males. Hispanic males in the same category earned 97 percent of what non-Hispanic white males earned, and those between the ages of 43 and 51 earned 100 percent when these factors, along with the ability to speak English, were taken into account.

But when researchers don't include these important characteristics in their analyses, the differential appears much greater. The unadjusted earnings of black males are only 70 percent of the earnings of whites, and Hispanics' earnings are 82 percent of whites. The same holds true for women. The raw numbers suggest that women lag far behind men in their pay -- a theme feminist groups have touted for years and one President Obama took up in his inaugural and State of the Union addresses. But the oft repeated claim that women earn only 77 cents for every dollar men earn is highly misleading, as the O'Neills go to great lengths to prove.


There is a large wage gap between men and women, one not entirely explained by years or quality of schooling, regional differences, or scores on aptitude tests. In fact, women have completed more years of schooling, on average, than men, live in all regions of the country, and score as well as males on aptitude tests. But women often make choices that have a large impact on their earnings, including the decision to have children.

Working mothers are more likely than men to work part time and take career breaks during the childbearing years, which means they accumulate fewer years of continuous work experience. And women also are more likely to try to balance work and family obligations by choosing occupations that provide more flexibility but less pay. Even women who work full time work fewer hours per week than their male counterparts. When all of these characteristics are factored in, the gender gap largely disappears. Young, childless single women, for example, earn comparable wages to similarly situated men.

The best way to close the wage gap between blacks, Hispanics and whites, the data suggest, is to encourage blacks and Hispanics to stay in school, study hard and commit to gaining work experience. When it comes to women, perhaps we should throw out the rhetoric and honor women's choices instead of trying to force them to conform to feminist priorities that place little value on families.


In reality, discrimination doesn't seem to be the biggest problem facing either minorities or women.

Linda Chavez is the author of "An Unlikely Conservative: The Transformation of an Ex-Liberal." To find out more about Linda Chavez, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at


Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos