The World Cup Is Reminding Foreigners How Great We Are
Fiery but Mostly Peaceful Riots Are the Language of the Unheard
This College Kid Had a Rather Nasty Reply for a Job Interview...and It...
Well, This Moment at the UFC Freedom 250 Event Is Going to Cause...
Karmelo Anthony Files an Appeal, but There's a Big Problem
Remember That Kidnapping Plot Against Gretchen Whitmer? One of Its Defendants Got Some...
Japanese World Cup Fans Just Exposed Everything Wrong With American Sports Culture
President Trump: Ships Are Moving Through the Strait of Hormuz
California Is Living Proof That More Money Can't Fix Bad Policy
JD Vance Thanks Americans for Their Patience As Iran Deal Is Finalized
Massie Exploits the USS Liberty
Here's What Dems Were Up to During Trump's UFC Freedom 250 Fight
The EU Is Aiding Chinese Tech Leadership
The Blue Texas Delusion Lives on Despite Decades of Democrat Failure
When Dawkins Met Claude, He Forgot About the Cell
OPINION

Sessions' Firing Displays Trump's Strange Definition of Loyalty

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Sessions' Firing Displays Trump's Strange Definition of Loyalty

The day after the midterm elections, President Trump fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions, replacing him at least temporarily with a more pliable loyalist. When Sessions got the news on Wednesday, he asked if he could finish the week. Nope. Close of business today was the answer.

Advertisement

Now, as a matter of law, Sessions wasn't fired. The president asked him for his resignation and Sessions agreed. That matters, because if Sessions had made Trump fire him, some restrictions would kick in that might make killing the Mueller investigation more difficult, if the president ends up going that way. In other words, Sessions' last official act as attorney general was one more act of unrequited loyalty to the boss.

Trump talks a lot about loyalty. He says it's very important to him. A few months ago, he suggested it should be against the law for people facing criminal charges to "flip" on their bosses. This was in the context of his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, reportedly considering doing exactly that.

In Trump's best-selling book "The Art of the Deal," there's a fascinating passage about his mentor, infamous lawyer/fixer Roy Cohn. "He was a truly loyal guy," Trump wrote. "It was a manner of honor with him."

He went on: "Just compare that with all the hundreds of 'respectable' guys who make careers out of boasting about their uncompromising integrity but have absolutely no loyalty. ... Roy was the sort of guy who'd be there at your hospital bed long after everyone else had bailed out, literally standing by you to the death."

Advertisement

But it was a one-way street. When Cohn contracted AIDS, "Donald found out about it and just dropped him like a hot potato," Susan Bell, Cohn's longtime secretary, told Politico. "It was like night and day."

Trump literally and figuratively wouldn't stand by the man who would've stood by him.

Sessions was the first senator to endorse Trump, at a time when doing so was still a considerable political risk. He campaigned for Trump. He defended Trump's most controversial statements -- about immigration, about Hillary Clinton, etc. A longtime advocate of restrictionist immigration policies, aggressive law enforcement and the drug war, Sessions saw in Trump a real opportunity to get his preferred agenda implemented.

And, as attorney general, Sessions more than any other Cabinet secretary put policy meat on the bones of Trump's rhetoric.

But none of that mattered, because Sessions, a former U.S. attorney and Alabama attorney general, believed he needed to recuse himself from the Mueller probe into allegations that Trump "colluded" with Russia. According to various reports, Sessions believed he not only had a legal and ethical obligation to do so, he also believed his recusal would be politically beneficial to the president because it would protect the integrity of the investigation.

Advertisement

Trump saw it differently. He believed that the first loyalty of the attorney general should be to Trump personally, not to the law or the Department of Justice.

This view was shared by Trump's most reliable loyalists, many of whom claim to be passionately committed to the "Trump agenda." But whenever that claim is put to the test, they reveal they are more committed to Trump himself. Jeanine Pirro of Fox News railed against Sessions, calling him a "shill" and hectoring him to "resign immediately" or "put on his big boy pants." Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr., who tends to define both conservatism and Christianity as personal loyalty to Trump, said that Sessions was merely one of those conservatives who "pretend" to be a "friends of conservatives and the faith community." He also said Sessions should rot in jail because, well, because Falwell is an idiot.

This is all one piece of the broader tapestry of what Trumpism always boils down to when put to the test: a cult of personality. Support of the man is more important than support of anything else, including Trump's own agenda. I disagree with Sessions on quite a few things, but the notion that he isn't a conservative is silly. More importantly, the idea that he's not a conservative -- or a man of integrity -- simply because he wouldn't display blind loyalty to the president is grotesquely unconservative.

Advertisement

Sessions resigned from the Senate to become attorney general because he thought he could accomplish important things. Trump had him fired (he refused to even talk to Sessions personally) because at the end of the day, the only truly important thing in Trump world is Trump.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement