Independent Socialist US Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont has been wowing crowds across the country. From his announcements for a presidential bid, to larger than expected initial crowds, Sanders is raking in the dough, from small donors and a budding media presence, Sanders is soaring in the polls, troubling Inevitable Hillary’s chances for the Election 2016 Presidential nomination.
Now he’s hitting the international media spotlight, and the lurid peering of the press has followed. The UK Daily Mail delved into his private life, and discovered that if elected, he would be the second divorced President in the country’s history. He fathered his first child out of wedlock, too.
The Daily Kos acknowledges the minority issues facing the old, white New Englander, but he is making the rounds in Wisconsin (where he bolstered Big Labor and took jabs at Governor Walker). He impressed progressive groups in Arizona and even Deep South Alabama.
Not just attacks from the right, but left-wing partisans have hammered Sanders for his pro-Second Amendment record. Progressives are furious with the New York City native for selling out his independent socialist ideology by joining the corporation-dominated Democratic Party.
Counterpunch writer Russel Mohkiber answers the deeper question about Sanders’ dubious “corporate” leanings, quoting a radio interview between corporate raider Ralph Nader with Chris Hedges, a left-wing native Vermonter, journalist, and minister:
Nader: “Bernie Sanders wants to break up the New York banks, he wants to impose a Wall Street transaction tax, he wants to regulate drug prices, he’s for full Medicare for all — everybody in, nobody out, free choice of doctor and hospital — he wants to get rid of these corporate tax havens, he’s pushing for a $15 dollar an hour minimum wage, he wants to stronger labor unions. What’s not to like?”
Recommended
Hedges: “Because he [Bernie Sanders] did it within the Democratic establishment. . . .He’s lending credibility to a party that is completely corporatized. He has agreed that he will endorse the candidate, which, unless there is some miracle, will probably be Hillary Clinton. So what he does is he takes all of that energy, he raises all of these legitimate issues and he funnels it back into a dead political system. . .
Left-wing partisans looking for a standard for their cause already view US Senator Sanders as a corporate sellout.
Another Counterpunch contributor, Paul Street, adds further firepower to the “Sanders Sellout” narrative:
Sanders did not “f[i]ght the Democratic establishment in Vermont his entire career.” As the left University of Vermont philosopher Will Miller noted in a 1999 essay recounting left peace activists’ occupation of then U.S. Congressman Bernie Sanders’ Burlington, Vermont office to protest Sanders’ support of the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia and the ongoing U.S. War on Iraq, Sanders sold out to the corporate and war Democrats as early as 1990.
So, Sanders played the two-party system to his advantage, partnering with federal Democratic handlers for endorsements, and in return diminishing viable third-party political movements in the Green Mountain State.
What also stands out in the above criticism is that Sanders, seeking the Democratic nomination as a Tea Party of the Left outlier, has a long-standing history of supporting presidential military forays: anathema to aggressive progressives.
In 1999, Congressman Sanders signed onto President Bill Clinton’s military interventions into Kosovo. Peace activists crashed his Burlington, VT Congressional Office. One of the protesters commented on the Liberty Union Party website:
In late April I was among the 25 Vermonters who occupied Congressman Bernie Sanders’ Burlington office to protest his support of the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia and the ongoing war against Iraq. Calling ourselves the “Instant Antiwar Action Group,” we decided to bring our outrage at Bernie’s escalating hypocrisy directly to his office, an action that resulted in 15 of us being arrested for trespass.
Dissident Voices blasted Sanders not just for cozying up with the Democratic Party, but war authorizations throughout his tenure in the House of Representatives.
Despite his own claims, Sanders has not been an antiwar leader. . . . His hawkish [stance] drove one of his key advisers, Jeremy Brecher, to resign from his staff. Brecher wrote in his resignation letter, “Is there a moral limit to the military violence you are willing to participate in or support?”
Click on this link for Brecher’s letter of resignation.
Dissident Voices continues:
Under the Bush regime, Sanders’ militarism has only grown worse. While he called for alternative approaches to the war on Afghanistan, he failed to join the sole Democrat, Barbara Lee, to vote against Congress’ resolution that gave George Bush a blank check to launch war on any country he deemed connected to the September 11 attacks.
Indeed, Barbara Lee (D-CA) was the lone vote against granting this extended power to President Bush. Sanders joined with both parties on this issue. Of course. While Presidential candidate Sanders has relaunched his speech on the House floor opposing the War on Iraq in 2002, Counterpunch has already exposed Sanders’ connections with Bush 43’s military ventures:
After thousands of people are killed in the World Trade Center and Pentagon, President George Bush and Congress declared war on Afghanistan. Sanders joined the bandwagon and voted to adopt the joint resolution that authorized the President to use the United States Armed Forces against anyone involved with the attacks of September 11th, 2001 and any nation that harbors these individuals.
And then:
While Sanders voted against the original authorization to use military force against Iraq, he followed that vote with several subsequent votes authorizing funding of that war and the debacle in Afghanistan.
Sanders has followed a pattern of voting against initial efforts to expand government resources into the War on Terror, then voted for funding them afterwards.
The Democratic Party’s 2016 Presidential bench is a clown-car of political dysphoria. From Hillary Clinton’s early yearning for Republican Barry Goldwater, to Lincoln Chafee’s former GOP US Senator status, and Jim Webb’s service in the Reagan Administration, now left-wing partisans can argue that “Weekend at Bernie” Sanders is right-wing warmonger.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member