So, That's Who CNN Was Busted Partying With in London Last Month
So, That's Why Dallas Police Shot and Killed a Member of Jasmine Crockett's...
Watch Scott Jennings Absolutely Get Under the Skin of This CNN Guest
This Quote From Gov. Stitt Is NOT Good News Regarding Who He'd Pick...
What These Two Girls Are Laughing About Is Beyond Disturbing
A Dissent for the Ages
So, That's How Republicans Just Lost a Long-Held Mayoral Seat By a Single...
The Cuba Situation Just Got a Lot More Crazy
Nevada Woman Accused of Running Fake Business to Traffic SNAP Benefits
Florida Man Causes Delay to Players Championship For Wacky Escape After Double Homicide
Romanian-Linked Theft Ring Accused of Draining $4M From CA Public Assistance Accounts
Trump Announces Build Up of War Ships in the Strait of Hormuz
The Congressman the Left Hates the Most Just Announced a Major Immigration Reform...
The Road to Tehran Runs Through Baku
The Parent-Led Rebellion Against EdTech
Tipsheet

Graph: Education Costs Explode While Performance Flat-lines

Graph: Education Costs Explode While Performance Flat-lines

A recent Mercatus Center report found that in 1920 the federal government spent just under 29 million in today’s dollars on education costs—that comes out to be only $1.34 per student. Today, that cost has ballooned to approximately $11,000 per student. While the funding has spiked, there seem to be few indications that additional funds are improving academic performance.

Advertisement

The U.S. Constitution is conspicuously silent on the topic of education, indicating (per the 10th Amendment) that the decisions remain at the hands of individual states. Despite this, federal education laws and regulations continue to bloat the system and have caused spending in the arena to skyrocket over the past few decades.

According to Courtney A. Collins, an economics professor and author of the recent report, the educational gains hardly outweigh the taxpayers' loses:

Reading scores for the National Assessment of Educational Progress have been reported since 1971. Scores for 17-year-olds show no significant change from 1971 to 2012, with only a slight increase for 9- and 13-year-olds. Similar trends exist for math scores, with even a small decrease for 17-year-olds. Plotting the scores across time creates basically a horizontal line — a stark contrast to the steep incline of federal oversight and spending across the same period.

The graph below helps conceptualize a few of the numbers discussed in the report.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement