So I Got a Call From The New York Times...
Why the Hell Should We Care If Democrats Don’t?
Israel Misunderstood
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 303: The Best of St. Paul
Greenland and the Return of Great-Power Politics
INSANITY: Mob of Leftist Rioters Stab and Beat Anti-Islam Activist in Minneapolis
U.S. Strike in Syria Kills Terrorist Linked to Murder of American Soldiers
Florida Man Convicted of $4.5M Scheme to Defraud U.S. Military Fuel Program
Chinese National Pleads Guilty to $27 Million Scam Targeting 2,000 Elderly Victims Nationw...
Orange County Man Arrested for Alleged Instagram Death Threats Against VP JD Vance
Hannity Grills Democrat Shri Thanedar After He Admits Voting Against Deporting Illegal Sex...
$68 Million Medicaid Fraud: Two Plead Guilty Over Brooklyn Adult Day Care Scheme
The Trump Administration Just Announced New Tariffs on Countries Deploying Troops to Green...
Minneapolis Alleged Gang Member, Felon Charged After Allegedly Stealing Rifle From FBI Veh...
JD Vance Just Destroyed This Indiana Republican for Failing to Act on Redistricting
Tipsheet

Graph: Education Costs Explode While Performance Flat-lines

A recent Mercatus Center report found that in 1920 the federal government spent just under 29 million in today’s dollars on education costs—that comes out to be only $1.34 per student. Today, that cost has ballooned to approximately $11,000 per student. While the funding has spiked, there seem to be few indications that additional funds are improving academic performance.

Advertisement

The U.S. Constitution is conspicuously silent on the topic of education, indicating (per the 10th Amendment) that the decisions remain at the hands of individual states. Despite this, federal education laws and regulations continue to bloat the system and have caused spending in the arena to skyrocket over the past few decades.

According to Courtney A. Collins, an economics professor and author of the recent report, the educational gains hardly outweigh the taxpayers' loses:

Reading scores for the National Assessment of Educational Progress have been reported since 1971. Scores for 17-year-olds show no significant change from 1971 to 2012, with only a slight increase for 9- and 13-year-olds. Similar trends exist for math scores, with even a small decrease for 17-year-olds. Plotting the scores across time creates basically a horizontal line — a stark contrast to the steep incline of federal oversight and spending across the same period.

The graph below helps conceptualize a few of the numbers discussed in the report.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement