This City Councilman Turned a $50K Deal Into a Personal Payday. Now He's...
Meet the Conservative Outsider Who Wants to Bring Common Sense Back to His...
How This Small-Town Police Force Became a 'Criminal Organization'
Iranian Regime's Latest Move Shows How Desperate It Has Become
CBS News Tried to Recalibrate Detention Stats — DHS Was Having None of...
If 'The Only Thing More Powerful Than Hate Is Love' Democrats Missed the...
Elites Did Their Part to Fight Global Warming by Flying Dozens of Private...
Man Who Pushed Propaganda About a Young Gazan Boy Slaughtered By The IDF...
Harry Sisson Refuses to House Illegals in His Home, And Claims ICE Agent...
Critics Blast Katie Porter's Pre Super Bowl X Post As She Tries to...
Will We Reach 100 Days of Straight Liberal Content on the Apple News...
Immigration Win: Federal Court Sides With Trump Admin on TPS Terminations for Multiple...
Federal Judge Blocks California Effort to Demask ICE Agents
Jasmine Crockett Might Be Running the Most Incompetent Campaign in History
WaPo Claims That Bad Bunny's Profane Performance Represented 'Wholesome Family Values'
Tipsheet

Who Is Amy Coney Barrett?

Robert Franklin /South Bend Tribune via AP, File

President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, from the White House on Saturday. Judge Barrett was confirmed to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2017. 

Advertisement

Her likely ascension to the highest court in the land has triggered a wide-ranging meltdown from liberals who selectively contextualize the Senate’s role of giving “advice and consent” on judicial nominees. Whispers of Barrett’s nomination also unleashed a host of attacks on her religion, as Democrats deem her faith as disqualifying for a seat on the bench. 

Barrett embodies much of what President Trump promised on the campaign trail: nominating well-qualified, brilliant, conservative jurists. During her time on the 7th circuit, Barrett has offered dissenting opinions in rulings that upheld abortion laws, Second Amendment infringements and unfettered immigration policy. She even criticized the “constitutional avoidance” of the high court’s ruling that upheld Obamacare as constitutional under Congress’ taxing power; the court is slated to review the law’s constitutionality after the election.

Aside from her textualist jurisprudence, which should ignite excitement from Conservatives, liberals ignore Barrett’s meeting of the basic qualifications necessary to sit on the bench. Prominent liberal lawyer and Harvard Law professor Noah Feldman acknowledged what the Left won’t about Barrett’s qualifications:

“I disagree with much of her judicial philosophy and expect to disagree with many, maybe even most of her future votes and opinions. Yet despite this disagreement, I know her to be a brilliant and conscientious lawyer who will analyze and decide cases in good faith, applying the jurisprudential principles to which she is committed. Those are the basic criteria for being a good justice. Barrett meets and exceeds them,” he wrote in Bloomberg Opinion. “Some might argue that you should want your probable intellectual opponent on the court to be the weakest possible, to help you win. But the Supreme Court is not and should not be a battlefield of winner-take-all political or ideological division.”

Advertisement

Barrett will undoubtedly be a victim of the left’s smear tactics, just two years after Democrats executed a character assassination campaign against Justice Brett Kavanaugh, purely based on the ideological slant of her jurisprudence. 

The Senate will rightfully confirm Barrett, who will play a key role in reshaping the court for decades to come.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement