The Left Gets Its Own Charlottesville
Pro-Hamas Activists March on NYPD HQ After Police Dismantled NYU's Pro-Hamas Camp
A Girl Went to Wendy's and Ended Up With Permanent Brain Damage
Patriots Owner to Columbia University: Say Goodbye to My Money
Democrats Are Going to Get Someone Killed and They’re Perfectly Fine With It
Postcards From the Edge of Cannibalism
Why Small Businesses Hate Bidenomics
The Empire Begins to Strike Back
The Empires Begin to Strike Back
With Cigarette Sales Declining, More Evidence Supports the Role of Flavored Vapes in...
To Defend Free Speech, the Senate Should Reject the TikTok Ban
Congress Should Not Pass DJI Drone Ban Legislation
Republican Jewish Coalition Endorses Bob Good's Primary Opponent Due to Vote Against Aid...
Here's What Kathy Hochul, Chuck Schumer Are Saying About Columbia University's Pro-Hamas P...
Minnesota State Sen. Arrested for Burglary, Raising 'Big Implications' Over Razor-Thin Maj...
Tipsheet

NC Senate Dem Candidate Refuses to Answer Question on Biden SCOTUS List

AP Photo/Gerry Broome

During the second general election debate in North Carolina’s highly-contested Senate race, between incumbent GOP Sen. Thom Tillis and Democrat Cal Cunningham, Senator Chuck Schumer’s hand-picked candidate punted on a straightforward question on the Supreme Court. 

Advertisement

When asked if former Vice President Joe Biden should release his list of candidates to be nominated to the high court, Cunningham refused to give a definitive answer.

Cunningham unintentionally made a great argument for filling the seat vacated by the late Justice Ginsburg, pointing out that “elections have consequences,” and citing the Senate’s role of giving “advice and consent” on judicial nominees.

Sen. Tillis saw right through Cunningham’s avoidance of a simple, relevant question about his party's nominee for president, and attributed the obvious deflection to the inevitable “radical direction” of the high court with Biden selecting justices. 

“Joe Biden does not want to put a list forward,” Tillis said in response. “Why can’t the American people know now, what Joe Biden is thinking with respect to the future of the court? It’s a court that will not defend our second amendment. It’s a court that will take us down a radical left path.”

Advertisement

Cunningham argued that the vacancy should be left untouched until the new Congress is seated, insisting that Biden’s presence on the ballot gives voters the ability to decide, but continued to ignore the fact that Biden has given minimal insight as to who he would nominate to the Supreme Court.

If Cunningham and other Democrats want to argue that voters should decide who nominates the next Supreme Court Justice, Biden should afford voters the same transparency that President Trump has by releasing a list of potential appointees, and Democrats should press their nominee to do so.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement