Ghanaian 'Prophet' Cons Followers Into Building Arks After Predicting Another Great Flood
Former Voice of America Reporter Accused of Assassination Plot Against Exiled Iranian Lead...
Christmas, Family, and the Cost of Saying ‘No’ to Trans Ideology
Trump’s DHS Pays Illegal Immigrants to Leave — Critics Ignore the Cost of...
BREAKING: President Trump Announces Christmas Day Airstrikes on ISIS in Nigeria
Adam Kinzinger Took Revenge on CBS Over 60 Minutes Drama. There's Just One...
Leftist College Professor Declares This Classic Christmas Movie 'Bigoted'
Michelle Wu Rewrites Boston’s History to Virtue-Signal at Trump
Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste: Aussie Pols Ram Through Bondi Beach-Inspired...
The White House Rejected Catholic Bishops' Immigration Christmas Wish
Nicki Minaj Faces Massive Backlash After Pro-Trump, Pro-Christian Speech at AmericaFest
17,500 Illegal Immigrants Arrested Under the Laken Riley Act
This Democrat is Trying to Rip Trump's Name From an Iconic Building
Justice Department Challenges Illinois Laws It Says Endanger Federal Agents
These Cringey Trans Terrorists Just Got Handed Federal Charges
Tipsheet

Reporter: Storming Mosul in the Spring Raises "Enormous Questions"

To reemphasize a point Katie made earlier: I suppose Uncle Sam could have sent a telegram, but if your goal is to tell your enemies when and where you’re coming, this works too:

Advertisement

An Iraqi and Kurdish military force of some 20,000 to 25,000 troops is being prepared to recapture the city of Mosul from Islamic State fighters, probably in the April-May time frame, an official at the U.S. Central Command said on Thursday.

The official said Mosul was currently being held by 1,000 to 2,000 Islamic State fighters. No decision has been made on whether small numbers of U.S. military advisers might need to be on the ground close to Mosul to direct close air support, the official told a group of reporters on condition of anonymity.

On the one hand, this announcement makes it clear to the American public that the US and its partners are thinking seriously about the threat of ISIS and planning a counteroffensive accordingly. This will perhaps alleviate some fears that the president isn’t doing all he can to “degrade and ultimately destroy” the terrorist group. On the other hand, this gives our enemies an alarming amount of information about a proposed -- and tentatively scheduled -- major engagement. Is this a good idea? Over to you, Richard Engel (via WFB):

Advertisement

Related:

ISIS

"It [the plan] sounds good, but there are enormous questions."

Engel seems less concerned about the announcement per se and more concerned about the preparedness of Iraqi and Kurdish forces. He sees a number of potential pitfalls with such a plan, as etched out on paper, that may, in fact, prove problematic if carried out in practice. Also, as noted above, our allies will likely have superior numbers when they commence the operation -- but if the siege is being broadcast across the world this early in advance, can there be any doubt ISIS' leadership will bolster their defenses before the battle begins?

This could be another complicating factor added to the mix, especially if US ground troops aren't necessarily sitting on the sidelines during the operation. After all, it appears they may not be.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement