She Stormed Off? Watch AG Pam Bondi Trigger the Hell Out of This...
The Canadian School Shooter Has Been Identified. Yes, It's a Transgender Person.
OpenAI Fires Executive Who Warned About 'Adult Mode'
You Won't Believe What Iran's President Just Said About His Regime Murdering Protesters
Somali Immigrants Are Now Claiming Parts of Minnesota Belong to Somalia
Wisconsin Students Left Out in the Cold As Evers Vows to Veto Federal...
'Dawson's Creek' Actor James Van Der Beek Dead at 48
Guess Which House Republican Voted Against the SAVE America Act Today
Missouri Bill Seeks to Protect Gun Owner Privacy
When Sports Were Fun
Gallup Admitted What Voters Already Know
The Slaughter Continues in Iran, As Nikki Haley Encourages Trump to Make a...
Rep. Ted Lieu Blasts AG Pam Bondi for Not Interviewing an Epstein Witness,...
The Con Consuming American Politics
If ICE Is Hamstrung, Hold on to Your Wallets
Tipsheet

DOJ Refuses To Hold Barr, Ross In Contempt. Here's Why.

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

The Department of Justice on Wednesday informed Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) they would not hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress for failing to produce documents related to Congressional subpoenas.

Advertisement

According to Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, the author of Wednesday's letter, said federal courts realized the sensitivity of documents relating to the Trump administration's decision to ask a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. The documents were privileged, meaning they couldn't be used in civil litigation. 

Despite that, the Oversight Committee received roughly 30,000 pages of documents relating to the policy decision.

"The Department of Justice's long-standing position is that we will not prosecute an official for contempt of Congress for declining to provide information subject to a presidential assertion of executive privilege," Rosen wrote. "Across administrations of both parties, we have consistently adhered to the position that 'the contempt of Congress statute was not intended to apply and could not constitutionally be applied to an Executive Branch official who asserts the President's claim of executive privilege.'"

Advertisement

Rosen cites multiple other instances where Department of Justice officials were not held in contempt for failing to respond to Congressional subpoenas. The most recent example was when the Republican-controlled House attempted to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to to comply with Congressional subpoenas related to Fast and Furious, the gunrunning case that left Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry dead.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement