"Dissent is patriotic." Until it isn't. On Fox News this morning, Top Hillary Clinton supporter and former DNC communications director Brad Woodhouse flew right past 'unpatriotic' -- a former bugaboo of the Left -- and leapt straight to the T-word. Why?
Advertisement
Social media immediately exploded in justified mockery, prompting Woodhouse to offer Lowry a reprieve from his Thought Crimes Against the State:
Rich - you're no traitor - you just sounded a little too happy about what Putin is up to. https://t.co/r0qHF7iBox
— Brad Woodhouse (@woodhouseb) October 6, 2015
How generous. By the way, the news hook for this exchange is the increasing evidence that Russia's pro-Assad interventionism in Syria involves clear actions against US interests; it's not a fight against ISIS, as claimed. In the face of Obama's ambivalence and weakness, Putin is escalating his defiant meddling, basking in the glow of American humiliation. Ah well. Details. In any case, as
Recommended
Advertisement
2014 flashback, Harry Reid is on the Senate floor hammering away at the Koch brothers and their "filthy money."
— Michael McAuliff (@mmcauliff) October 6, 2015
Advertisement
Prosaic demagoguery. The thesis of Mary Katharine Ham and my book, End of Discussion, is that many on the Left are increasingly resorting to tactics that seek to "win" political and cultural debates by preventing those debates from actually happening. It takes intellectual exertion to argue on the merits and compete in the arena of ideas; impugning motives and casting opponents as de facto evil -- racist, sexist, homophobic, unpatriotic, etc. -- is lazier, easier, and all too often effective. I'll leave you with this soothing flashback voice memo to Brad Woodhouse from the woman for whom he's now shilling. Ah, the good old days:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member