Justice Jackson Says the 'Most Horrible Thing I've Ever Heard' About the First...
The Trump Campaign Has a New Description for Joe Biden
Ungrateful Palestinians Complaining About US Aid Undercuts Their 'We're Starving' Narrativ...
Netanyahu to Biden: I'm Taking Rafah, Destroying Hamas, And You Can’t Do Anything...
Texas Just Got Some Bad News From the Supreme Court About Their Immigration...
Hitler the Stand-Up Comedian
NYT Once Again Acknowledges Just How Devastating Pandemic School Closures Were on Students
Joe Biden Is Back to Pretending His Granddaughter Doesn't Exist
Bob Good, Chip Roy Lead Letter Insisting Spending Bills Secure the Border
Biden in Trouble Not Just in Battleground States, but Battleground Districts
Here's Who Is Back in the Lead on Eve of Ohio Primary
One State May Ban Public Funds for So-Called ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care
Team Trump Makes Moves Following Fani Willis Decision
Laken Riley’s Father Is Speaking Out
This Is What the Democrat Governor of Massachusetts Had to Say About a...
OPINION

Europe Cuts Rates to Below Zero, Good or Bad?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

The European Central Bank, under Italian banker Mario Draghi, cut its bank deposit rate below zero in an effort to “avert the dangerous threat of deflation” and to spur the “sluggish” euro-zone economy.

Advertisement

European monetary policy gradually has shifted toward more and more inflation. It started off with a hard-core resistance to inflation under a Dutch president of the European central bank, then made way for a Frenchman, and now an Italian has taken over.

The idea is to encourage bankers to start making loans instead of depositing their funds with the central bank. In the United States, the Federal Reserve actually pays interest on bank deposits. Not surprisingly, U.S. banks are not lending to small business like they used to.

Stocks in Europe and around the globe (especially emerging markets) rallied on the news, and we’re profiting with new positions in India and Greece.

Is deflation really a “bugbear?” According to the standard view, “Deflation cuts into business profits, raises real debt burdens and discourages consumer purchases, hampering investments and jobs. The strong euro has not helped because it has damped inflation by lowering import prices, while also making Europe's exports more expensive in foreign markets.”

Yet there have been times of robust growth in the midst of deflation — look at the United States in the 1890s, the 1920s and the 1950s. Deflation does not necessarily hurt business profits if costs are falling, too.

My fear is that the never-ending low-interest rate strategy by the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank will create an artificial boom and more asset bubbles that will end badly. Only time will tell.

Advertisement

Top investment managers and advisers will debate in full the implications of these permanent low-interest rates at this year’s FreedomFest. Join Peter Schiff, Alex Green, Adrian Day, Joel Stern, and yours truly in our "All Star Prediction Panel" July 10: www.freedomfest.com.

You Blew It!
Could Walmart’s Walton Family Buy Seattle?

The Huffington Post last week ran a creative story, “Walmart's Founding Family Could Literally Buy Every Home in Seattle.”

According to the reporter, “Walmart’s founding family could afford to buy every home in Seattle. Literally. The Walton family's combined wealth of $154.8 billion is enough to purchase all 241,450 homes in the Emerald City, which are worth a total of $111.5 billion, according to an analysis published Thursday by real estate brokerage firm Redfin.”

Or the Waltons could buy every house in Dallas at $109.4 billion, Washington, D.C. at $109.2 billion or Miami at $92.8 billion.

The reporter went on to say that Bill Gates’s $78.4 billion could buy all of Boston and Warren Buffett’s $65.8 billion could buy Charlotte, N.C. In addition, Google co-founder Larry Page’s $30.8 billion could buy Boca Raton, Fla. and the Koch brothers’ $78.1 billion could buy Atlanta.

“In this fictional real estate investment, the 30 billionaires on our list, with a combined fortune of $582 billion, could afford to own a staggering 6 percent of the total U.S. home equity,” Nela Richardson, Redfin’s chief economist, said in a statement.

Advertisement

But there’s a fatal flaw in this creative story. It is dead wrong. None of these billionaires could come even close to “literally” buying up all the houses in any of these cities.

The reason? Supply and demand. The current prices of houses (or any other product) in Seattle, Boston, Miami or anywhere else is based on a small marginal number of homes for sale at any one time.

If the Walton family suddenly started buying up every home in the Seattle area, prices would skyrocket. Instead of selling for an average price of $200,000, homes suddenly would be going for $300,000 or $500,000 and would keep increasing as word spread that the Waltons were coming.

In fact, the idea that Bill Gates is actually worth $78 billion is a fiction. Imagine, if he tried to sell all of his Microsoft stock. The price of the shares would plummet. The only way he could get his money out is if he sold gradually over a long period of time.

Always remember this: all prices are determined by marginal buying and selling. If the margins change, watch out.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos