Dr. Marty Makary — a rare voice of reason and sanity throughout the COVID-19 pandemic — is out with a review of the "real data" behind the new vaccines being pushed by the Biden administration and Democrat leaders around the country.
Makary, along with Dr. Tracy Høeg, open their analysis of the new vaccines Biden & Co. are pushing for Americans as young as six months old with an alarming scenario that's anything but hypothetical.
What if I told you one in 50 people who took a new medication had a 'medically attended adverse event' and the manufacturer refused to disclose what exactly the complication was — would you take it?
And what if the theoretical benefit was only transient, lasting about three months, after which your susceptibility goes back to baseline?
And what if we told you the Food and Drug Administration cleared it without any human-outcomes data and European regulators are not universally recommending it as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is?
Writing in The New York Post, Makary and Høeg say that's all scientists know about the new vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna that are being more than recommended by the Biden administration.
"The push is so hard that former White House COVID coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha and CDC head Mandy Cohen are making unsupported claims the new vaccine reduces hospitalizations. long COVID and the likelihood you will spread COVID," the doctors' analysis explains. "None of those claims has a shred of scientific support," and "if the manufacturers said that, they could be fined for making false marketing claims beyond an FDA-approved indication."
FDA should have rejected these data:
— Marty Makary MD, MPH (@MartyMakary) September 15, 2023
▪️Pfizer's new vaccine was approved based on 10 mice (no human data)
▪️Moderna's new vax was tested in 50 people tracked for just 2wks. One person had an adverse event requiring med attention-Moderna provided no detailshttps://t.co/Cb9yNMuCWM
Yet, the Biden administration is plunging ahead with another push to drive up the use of these new vaccines, a push that blows past what The Science™ says or The Experts™ have concluded.
Recommended
"The questions surrounding Moderna’s new COVID vaccine approved this week are still looming," Makary and Høeg say of the reality being ignored by the White House. "Pfizer’s version, approved this week as well, also has zero efficacy data and has not been tested on humans at all," they note. "We only have data about antibody production from 10 mice."
Does the Biden administration view the American people as any better than lab rats? It seems not based on this situation.
What's more, the doctors note that neither the FDA nor Moderna have disclosed "what happened to the patient who took the new vaccine and had a complication that required medical attention."
Worth pointing out👇
— Tracy Høeg, MD, PhD (@TracyBethHoeg) September 13, 2023
Of the 50 study participants that got the Moderna monovalent vax @CDCgov universally recommended today, 1/50 (2%) had a medically-attended adverse event related to the vax
W/unknown clinical benefits how can CDC say w certainty benefits outweigh risks 4 all? pic.twitter.com/vnRrDLQeRj
Were there contributing factors to the complication? How serious was it? Are there any long term effects from the complication?
None of these answers have or are likely to come from the Biden administration in their push to get the new vaccine administered far and wide. Why even have regulators if they are apparently unwilling to scrutinize the things they approve?
The CDC's incredible absolutism that all Americans must get this novel Covid vaccine is inconsistent with the data.
— Marty Makary MD, MPH (@MartyMakary) September 15, 2023
Why have an FDA if this is our new regulatory process?@TracyBethHoeg and I reviewed all the data. Here's our analysis (above)
Despite the White House's refusal to give Americans the full, honest picture, Makary and Høeg are among those reminding America's leaders that "[t]he public has a right to know." Indeed.
