Trump Basically Says Starting Tonight, Hell Will Rain Down on Iran
Why Are There FBI Agents Outside of Lindsey Graham's DC Residence?
After Ousting Graham Platner in Maine, Bernie Sanders Says President Trump Doesn't Believe...
Representation Matters in Movies, Right Up Until It Doesn't
Did Jon Ossoff Really Say This About Liberty and Supporting ICE?
CNBC Lists the Ten 'Worst' States to Live In. See If You Can...
The New York Times Explainer for Its Catch-and-Kill Report to Benefit Graham Platner
Congress' Most Prolific Stock Traders Are Holding a Ritzy Fundraiser for Democrat Elaine...
Sarah Trone Garriott Is Running for Congress in Iowa, and She Wants Socialized...
A Girls' Frisbee Team Was Disqualified From Competition for 'Misgendering'
These Three Arizona Democrats Are Backed by the Soros Family
Marco Rubio Just Declared War on the International Criminal Court and International Law
It's the Communists Versus the Patriots. Or Is It?
A Grand Prix Race Heads to DC – But It Wasn't An Easy...
Exclusive: Democrat Paige Cognetti Says the U.S. Occupies 'Stolen Land' in Unearthed Video
Tipsheet

Even Jeffrey Toobin Knows SCOTUS Arguments Were a 'Disaster' for Abortion Advocates

Even Jeffrey Toobin Knows SCOTUS Arguments Were a 'Disaster' for Abortion Advocates
Photo by Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP, File

The much-anticipated Supreme Court arguments — more on those from Katie here — over abortion access versus the right to life in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization did not go well on Wednesday for those advocating for some constitutional right to abortion. 

Advertisement

It doesn't require any spin to glean that impression from the arguments if you tuned in live, either. The arguments offered — and responses to questions from justices — from those seeking to end Mississippi's protections for the unborn were so bad that even CNN's chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin called it a "wall-to-wall disaster."

Multiple questions posed to the pro-abortion side — especially from Justices Thomas and Barrett — were apparently too much to handle, as observers pointed out.

Of course, pitching abortion as a constitutional right and defending Roe v. Wade as a sound principle is an undesirable position to be in. As Justice Roberts highlighted, the pro-abortion side was arguing for laws more similar to those of North Korea and China than are found in Europe and elsewhere.

Advertisement

Justice Alito grew apparently frustrated with the pro-abortion side's non-answers to his questions and demanded "give me a yes or no."

Others who've witnessed the machinations of the Supreme Court from the inside also shared their evaluations of Wednesday's arguments, and they thought it "went about as badly for the pro-abortion side as it could reasonably have been expected to go."

And while criticism of the pro-abortion arguments came from all sides, credit was given to those arguing on the side of life for their succinct and competent explanation of new knowledge of fetal pain and science allowing babies to survive outside the womb earlier that has developed since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973. 

Advertisement

The result of the pro-abortion side's mediocre-at-best performance before the High Court has already caused The New York Times and Washington Post to throw in the towel and predict that the Supreme Court will likely uphold Mississippi's protection of the unborn — and open the door to overruling Roe v. Wade

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement