Hirono Went Off the Rails Questioning Pete Hegseth
Democrats Destroyed California
Pete Hegseth Shuts Down Democratic Senators Grilling Him on Women in Combat
Pete Hegseth Addresses 'Smear Campaign' Allegations During Senate Confirmation Hearing
Why SCOTUS Decision on Gun Control Laws Might Not Be the End of...
One Notable Figure Will Not Attend Trump's Inauguration
Texas AG Is Suing Allstate for Building 'World’s Largest Driving Behavior Database'
About Face: Poland's Hasty Reversal on an Outrageous Threat
Pete Hegseth Had the Perfect Response to Claims of 'White Supremacy' Within the...
Poll: The Majority of Americans Think Biden Lost Ground on Key Issues
Scott Jennings Has Leftist CNN Panelist Squirming Over Hard Truths on California Fires
Far-Left Protestors Disrupt Pete Hegseth's Confirmation Hearing
One GOP Governor Just Ordered the Flags Full Staff. Here's Why.
Wow: Major American University Severs Ties With Chinese Partner After Espionage Revelation...
What Democrats and Luigi Mangione Missed About America's Troubled Health Care System
Tipsheet

Even Jeffrey Toobin Knows SCOTUS Arguments Were a 'Disaster' for Abortion Advocates

Photo by Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP, File

The much-anticipated Supreme Court arguments — more on those from Katie here — over abortion access versus the right to life in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization did not go well on Wednesday for those advocating for some constitutional right to abortion. 

Advertisement

It doesn't require any spin to glean that impression from the arguments if you tuned in live, either. The arguments offered — and responses to questions from justices — from those seeking to end Mississippi's protections for the unborn were so bad that even CNN's chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin called it a "wall-to-wall disaster."

Multiple questions posed to the pro-abortion side — especially from Justices Thomas and Barrett — were apparently too much to handle, as observers pointed out.

Of course, pitching abortion as a constitutional right and defending Roe v. Wade as a sound principle is an undesirable position to be in. As Justice Roberts highlighted, the pro-abortion side was arguing for laws more similar to those of North Korea and China than are found in Europe and elsewhere.

Advertisement

Justice Alito grew apparently frustrated with the pro-abortion side's non-answers to his questions and demanded "give me a yes or no."

Others who've witnessed the machinations of the Supreme Court from the inside also shared their evaluations of Wednesday's arguments, and they thought it "went about as badly for the pro-abortion side as it could reasonably have been expected to go."

And while criticism of the pro-abortion arguments came from all sides, credit was given to those arguing on the side of life for their succinct and competent explanation of new knowledge of fetal pain and science allowing babies to survive outside the womb earlier that has developed since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973. 

Advertisement

The result of the pro-abortion side's mediocre-at-best performance before the High Court has already caused The New York Times and Washington Post to throw in the towel and predict that the Supreme Court will likely uphold Mississippi's protection of the unborn — and open the door to overruling Roe v. Wade

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement