Norms Only Exist to Protect the Status Quo. Ignore Them.
ICE Does a Triple Pick-Up of Illegals in Minnesota...and Their Crimes Are Henious
(D)ifferent Kinds of Kings
When Dissent Becomes Sabotage: The Rise of the Counter-MAGA Fifth Column
Criminals Are Stealing Billions From America’s Seniors. AARP Is Fighting Back.
Hey, Tucker: Christianity and Islam Have a Long and Very Bitter History
Disposable Democrats
The Media Exploit the Pope As Trump's Public Enemy No. 1
How Hungary Matters
When the Rules Don't Apply to the Rulers
Mamdani’s Government Grocery Store Is an Awful Idea
Why Taxpayers Should Stop Funding Planned Parenthood and Start Investing in Moms
Massachusetts School District Enters Federal Agreement to Protect Jewish Students From Har...
Indian National Convicted for Scamming 79-Year-Old Vietnam Veteran Out of Gold
Exclusive: Controversy From Anti-Trump Republican's Employment of Far-Left Staffer Causes...
Tipsheet

Why the NYT Had to Issue a Monster Correction for This Piece About Trump and NATO

Why the NYT Had to Issue a Monster Correction for This Piece About Trump and NATO
AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell

Oh no, NATO is getting its feelings hurt by Donald Trump. Good!  

They’re the most useless, ungrateful group we could associate with, and if we don’t follow Mr. Obama’s 2012 remark that ‘the 80s called and want their foreign policy back,’ the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is a relic of the Cold War and should be dissolved or significantly reworked. There are too many freeloaders and countries that can’t contribute anything meaningful to strengthen this alliance. Trump's criticisms are valid. 

Advertisement

That continent is snobby. They hate us, and frankly, I could do without them right now. But, you know, the press, who love the Europeans, are going to peddle this nonsense: If NATO goes away, everyone will die

Okay, it's not that hyperbolic, but whatever argument is made for staying in NATO can take a pass this week. Just look at The New York Times’ piece about it, though the real story was the initial headline. Apparently, someone at the publication didn't know what NATO stood for.

The alliance, built after World War II to deter the Soviet Union and keep the peace in Europe, is in crisis, with some questioning whether it can survive. The Mideast war has brought existing doubts about American commitment to the alliance to the fore, argued Ivo Daalder, a former American ambassador to NATO. 

“It’s hard to see how any European country will now be able and willing to trust the United States to come to its defense,” he said. “Hope, perhaps. But they can’t count on it.” 

In his speech to the nation Wednesday night, Mr. Trump did not mention NATO, to the relief of allies.

 But a senior European official said he thought most Europeans did not believe that Article 5, the NATO commitment to collective defense, still had teeth. The United States now seems part of the problem of world disorder, the official said, speaking anonymously given the sensitivity of the topic. The country is no longer the solution and the guarantor of last resort, he said.

Advertisement

Hollowing out NATO—yeah, why not. The entire continent is undergoing death by suicidal empathy. 

Now, if we want to reorganize NATO, yeah, Trump should make it the "North American Treaty Organization."

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement