Herr Platner Is Taking Democrat Credibility Down With Him
The US Has to Act Now to Ensure We Dominate the Future of...
The Scott Pelley Saga Is Over at CBS News, but Not the Melodramatics...
Nicole Parker’s 'The Two FBIs' and the Battle for the Bureau’s Soul
You Just Thought You Hated HOAs Before
Our Enemies Lie
TDS Watch: The 'Convicted Felon' Argument
Will Single-Payer Healthcare Champions Ever Offer Something Credible?
Beaufort, the Tehran Grand Bazaar, and Boots on the Ground in Lebanon
Putting Real Pride Into Pride Month
The Looming Fight Over Intellectual Diversity – Restoring the Academy’s Reason for Being
Michigan Rapper Sentenced to 10 Years for $63M Mail Theft Scheme
Two Foreign NIH Researchers Charged With Smuggling Monkeypox Into U.S.
USDA Finds $13.3 Million in Potential Ohio SNAP Fraud
'Reconciliation 3.0' Is Almost Here – And It Might Include the SAVE America Act
Tipsheet

He Defied SCOTUS? Here’s the Judge at the Center of the Latest Judicial Insurrection

He Defied SCOTUS? Here’s the Judge at the Center of the Latest Judicial Insurrection
AP Photo/Brennan Linsley, File

The Supreme Court ruled that the Trump deportation policy can continue without the limited notice provision issued by these little judges who thought that giving every deportee a hearing was a sensible immigration policy. First, anyone fighting his or her deportation order virtually loses every time; if we want you gone, you’re going. Second, no court dates were etched into the dockets when these illegals were imported under Biden, but now we need to have a season of Law and Order to boot them. Please. Also, none of the illegals Obama deported got a hearing. 

Advertisement

Then, the judge who started this cockamamie circus opts to defy the Supreme Court. 

His name is Brian Murphy, and if you think he sounds familiar, you’d be right. In May, we covered how he thought that one’s racial background should be considered at sentencing: 

The second red flag was during his confirmation process when he was asked by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) about this letter from the Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in 2022, where Murphy, as a board member, had his name affixed to the letterhead. 

It was titled, “In Reply to the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court,” where it included numerous soft-on-crime lunacies, like, “After trial, no defendant should be sentenced until a future date when the judge shall receive from the defense a social worker’s report that describes the defendant’s background and circumstances, including how structural racism has impacted the defendant’s life.” 

While on the board for the Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Murphy pursued other soft-on-crime nonsense, like ending qualified immunity for cops and nixing “arrests for all alleged minor infractions such as using a counterfeit $20 bill to buy cigarettes, as happened to George Floyd, but also for fraught and unnecessary police encounters involving possessory offenses, assault and battery, breaking and entering, and similar offenses.” 

Advertisement

Related:

DONALD TRUMP

What is it with these people from Massachusetts? They learned nothing about public safety from the Willie Horton fiasco. This guy also wanted bail to be set for a man accused of first-degree murder. Democrats made this man a judge. 

Absolute lunacy.  

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement