Trump White House Laughs at Lib Media for Taking Their January 6 Bait
Watch Jon Stewart Call Out Mark Kelly Over the Dems' Silly Illegal Orders...
Minneapolis Hilton Nixing ICE Agent Reservations Is Now Facing the Consequences
California's Government Better Get Ready for the Minnesota Treatment
Minnesota's Legislative Auditor Just Dropped a Bombshell on Tim Walz
The Townhall 50 – Ranking the Worst Journalists of 2025, Part 2: #11-30
Guess What We Just Learned About Mamdani's Anti-Homeownership 'Tenant Advisor'
AAG Harmeet Dhillon Puts the Mamdani Administration on Notice Over Marxist Housing Policie...
Why Hasn't Trump Repealed Biden's $50 Billion Backdoor Business Tax Increase?
Tucker Carlson Once Claimed the U.S. Would Kill Maduro to Push Gay Marriage,...
Dan Bongino Declares War on 'Grifters and Bums' as He Plans to Return...
Rep. Jasmine Crockett Says 'F**k You' to Supreme Court Over Texas Redistricting
The Long Awaited Trial for Ashli Babbitt, That Never Came
The Democrats Held a J6 Anniversary Vigil and It's Far More Cringe-Worthy Than...
Iran's Solution to the Mass Protests Is a $7 Stimulus Package
Tipsheet

The Crucial Detail That's Missing in the Hegseth Signal Chat Saga

AP Photo/Virginia Mayo

When I first read the story, there was a sense of dread: top Trump officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, had somehow added The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg onto a group chat on the encrypted messenger app Signal. How and why are unanswered questions, but there must be accountability for this trip-up. This chat was candid about certain foreign operations, specifically countering the Houthi threat, another failed initiative of the Biden administration. National Security Adviser Michael Waltz was also on these communications—the fact that Goldberg, the father of the losers and suckers lie 2020 and the recent ‘Trump loves Nazi generals’ myth, got added to this chat is unfathomable. 

Advertisement

It's a lengthy piece; some officials are cast in a good light despite this oversight, and others are not so much. That’s not important. Trump officials authenticated the chat. It caused a stir among the liberal media and the anti-Trump losers who now support Democrats. Hillary Clinton even chimed in, someone who, regardless of the situation, should keep her mouth shut, as she conducted all official State Department business through an unsecured server that wasn’t approved and got hacked by foreign adversaries. And yes, classified documents went through that server. Ms. Two-time presidential loser, it’s possible to hold the position that both instances are terrible

Flashback:

 

The outstanding question, besides how they allowed some fake news reporter into this chat, is whether secret war plans were shared. That’s what Goldberg alleges: “The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans.” He claims he saw them but won’t print them because that would be a disclosure of classified documents. I wouldn’t trust Jeff as far as I could throw him—too many times, he’s penned fake news. The Trump administration has confirmed the chats are real, but the secret war plan angle wasn’t even touched. 

Advertisement

Related:

LIBERAL MEDIA

It's a horrible, unforced error, but Watergate 2.0 is not. CNN’s Scott Jennings went line-by-line about how this is really a lot of noise regarding state secrets.

One, Signal was already installed on several devices used by those involved. They knew there was another platform to disclose and discuss highly classified materials. We don’t know if war plans were discussed. We do know that we have an administration working on something substantive on the Houthi threat. 

Tony Kinnett of the Daily Signal: 

I've read the Atlantic article & Signal messages twice, top to bottom. Most of those on social media ringing alarm bells and repeating talking points have not. 

Should Goldberg have been added to the chat? No. 

Did Goldberg gain access to "secret" information? Kind of. He found out we'd strike the Houthis two hours early. 

What Goldberg & the Atlantic are calling TOP SECRET "war plans" is a massive embellishment—any butterbar fresh out of ROTC could tell you that. These aren't war plans. These aren't even school board notes. 

They're "Ok, we're ready to do that thing everyone knew we were going to do? Yep? Neat. Also Europe sucks." 

Watergate this is not. It's a final, informal check-in after things are already planned/assigned. 

Advertisement

And no, this isn’t some major win for the legacy press. It’s barely been 24 hours, and this story has already peaked. It is starting to fizzle out because there’s nothing there regarding what liberals want to exist, which is a massive security breach along the lines of the damage Robert Hanssen did at the FBI. I bet this story will be out of the cycle by next week. There will be no shortage of attempts to keep it in the cycle, though, but this publication and its author have penned too many fake news stories for it to be believable.

Advertisement

Last note: In case the Democrats start ripping those for using Signal, we have receipts.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos