Here's an Update on How the ICE Deportations Are Going
Copper State Showdown: Here Are the Elections to Watch
ESPN Layoffs Hit On-Air Talent, With One Fired While on the Air; Honoring...
Ignore the Fearmongering of the Trans Activist Crowd
Wisconsin's 76th Assembly District Race Is Bizarre
'Annoying, Bitter Old Man': Journey Keyboardist Slams Bruce Springsteen for Politicizing M...
James Talarico Fought to Expose Kids to Inappropriate LGBTQ Books
Do Teachers Unions Actually Care About Teaching Anymore?
From Swalwell to Gallego to Gray: Democrats’ Slush Fund Scandal Spreads
NBC News Blames Idaho Laws for Death of Trans Teen
Rep. Lisa McClain Sounds the Alarm on Communism’s Return to American Politics
Exploitation Isn't a Free Market Problem. It's a Government One.
As Fetterman Floats Ditching Dems, Top GOP Leader Reveals Whether He'd Be Welcomed
Disney Guts Pixar, ESPN in Third Round of Layoffs This Year
Some Cubans May Finally Get Humanitarian Aid As Communist Leaders Rail Against U.S.
Tipsheet

Clarence Thomas Rails Against Trans Youth 'Experts'

Clarence Thomas Rails Against Trans Youth 'Experts'
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

This week, Townhall covered how the Supreme Court of the United States upheld Tennessee’s ban on so-called “gender-affirming care” for minors suffering from gender dysphoria.

Advertisement

In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled that Tennessee’s law does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment because it does not classify based on sex or gender identity. It concluded that the state has a legitimate interest in protecting children from the adverse impact of these treatments.

Going forward, Tennessee children will be protected from puberty blockers, hormone replacement therapy, and sex reassignment surgery.

Justice Clarence Thomas penned a solo concurring opinion slamming so-called transgender youth “experts.”

“The Court rightly rejects efforts by the United States and the private plaintiffs to accord outsized credit to claims about medical consensus and expertise. The United States asserted that ‘the medical community and the nation’s leading hospitals overwhelmingly agree’ with the Government’s position that the treatments outlawed by SB1 can be medically necessary…The implication of these arguments is that courts should defer to so-called expert consensus. There are several problems with appealing and deferring to the authority of the expert class…contrary to the representations of the United States and the private plaintiffs, there is no medical consensus on how best to treat gender dysphoria in children,” he wrote.

Advertisement

Related:

SUPREME COURT

“This case carries a simple lesson: In politically contentious debates over matters shrouded in scientific uncertainty, courts should not assume that self-described experts are correct,” Thomas wrote.

Anymore, if medical providers try to “transition” children, they could face $25,000 civil fines for breaking the law. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement