Supreme Court Just Agreed to Rule on This Controversial Immigration-Related Executive Orde...
This Is What Gavin Newsom Had to Say After Halle Berry Leveled Him
How This Prominent Health Foundation Became a Progressive Political Bankroller
The Media's Latest Defense of Minnesota's Somali Community Fails Basic Math
Mamdani Vows to Make NYC a Haven for the Homeless
The Peace President: Trump Honored With FIFA's 2025 Peace Prize
A Violent Murderer Said He Felt 'Unsafe' in Men's Prison. Guess What Illinois...
Here's How U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer Worked to Silence American Conservatives
Another Afghan National Was Busted for Allegedly Plotting a Mass Shooting
Media Gaslighting Works: Here's How Many Voters Know Charlie Kirk’s Assassin Was...
JD Vance Blasts 'Bullsh*t Narrative’ Blaming Trump Administration for Biden’s Economy
Katie Porter's Support Nosedives in California Gubernatorial Race Following Viral Outburst...
Obama Went Bragging About Obamacare This Week, There's Just One Problem
If We Care About Lawfare, Start With the DEI and Woke Requirements Being...
Boomers Wanted Grandkids. The Fed Helped Price Them Out of Existence.
Tipsheet

Jobs May Need to Be 'Sacrificed' to Pursue Climate Agenda, Biden's Energy Secretary Nominee Says

AP Photo/Al Goldis, File

From canceling the Keystone XL Pipeline permit, which was projected to employ 11,000 Americans, to banning new oil and gas leases on federal land, Energy Secretary nominee Jennifer Granholm faced tough questions during a Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday over the job losses President Biden’s climate agenda will result in.

Advertisement

During a line of questioning from Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), whose state will reportedly lose tens of thousands of jobs over the ban, Granholm admitted some jobs will be “sacrificed.”

"I'm just curious how a long-term ban consistent with the president's goal of unifying our country and putting Americans back to work and helping our economies grow, how is that all consistent?" the ranking member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources asked.

“I think the president’s plan of building back better … would create more jobs in energy, clean energy, than the jobs that might be sacrificed,” Granholm replied. “But I will say this, no job — we don't want to see any jobs sacrificed.”

She later said where there is a heavy concentration of these type of jobs in states, “we’re going to have to work on together to ensure that people remain employed.”

Others, like Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), pointed out that it will not be a comfort to these workers to know that perhaps they can switch to a job in the green energy industry down the road, in another state. 

Advertisement

“If you’ve lost a job that is putting food on your table now, it’s cold comfort to know that years from now, in a different state, perhaps with a different training … there will be another job available,” he said.

Granholm acknowledged the “concern” about job losses and pivoted to her experience as governor of Michigan when renewable energy jobs were brought to the state.

“What I can tell you is from my experience in Michigan is that when we focused on providing incentives for job providers to locate in Michigan in clean energy they came,” she said.

Barrasso later commented on Twitter about Granholm's remarks, saying that “No American should have their job “sacrificed” – Not now. Not ever.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos