US Attorney Asks Judge to Dismiss Indictment Against Steve Bannon
Jasmine Crockett Shows Just How Low Democrats Are Willing to Go to Attack...
Scott Jennings: Democrats Are Losing the Voter ID Argument
Guess Why This Kentucky Judge Gave an Unrepentant Criminal a Lighter Sentence
A Boy Has Stolen Another Girls' Championship Title
Dozens of Detransitioners Have Filed Lawsuits, and the Costs Could End 'Gender-Affirming C...
While Homeless New Yorkers Freeze, the NYT Wants Us to Know This About...
Sen. Warren Repeats Debunked Lie About Women and the SAVE Act
We Must Not Submit to 'Diversity'
A Maryland Squatter Walks Free — and Here's What Her Attorney Had...
AWFUL Who Harassed Yoga Studio Employees Over ICE Earned Herself a Ban
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
Trump Targets Obama’s Climate 'Endangerment Finding' in Sweeping Rollback of Emissions Rul...
Steve Hilton Isn’t Even Governor Yet, and He’s Already Exposing California Welfare Fraud
Tipsheet

DOJ Appeals Ruling that Required HHS to Facilitate Abortions for Unaccompanied Minors

Department of Justice lawyers appealed a D.C. Circuit court ruling Monday, by Obama appointee Judge Tanya Chutkan, which was issued against the HHS Office of Refugee Resettlement’s policy of refusing to facilitate abortions for unaccompanied minors in their custody. The ruling also allowed the American Civil Liberties Union’s case against the policy to go forward as a class action lawsuit.

Advertisement

The case of Jane Doe, an unaccompanied minor who sought and ultimately obtained an abortion while in one of ORR’s federally funded shelters, started the legal battle between the Trump administration and the ACLU on the issue in October. The DOJ filed a Supreme Court petition in the case of Doe in November, arguing that ACLU attorneys misled them as to the timing of her abortion before they had a chance to file an appeal in the case.

Democrats and abortion groups have been calling for the firing of ORR Director Scott Lloyd over the policy, but HHS Secretary Alex Azar defended Lloyd last month saying it was longstanding HHS policy to have the ORR Director sign off on serious medical procedures for unaccompanied minors in their custody.

“The Department of Health & Human Services strongly maintains that taxpayers are not responsible for facilitating the abortion of unaccompanied minors who entered the country illegally and are currently in the government’s care," a spokesperson for HHS said in an initial response to Chutkan’s ruling last month.

“While ORR and its director are certainly entitled to maintain an interest in fetal life, and even to prefer that pregnant UC [unaccompanied immigrant minor children] in ORR custody choose one course over the other, ORR may not create or implement any policy that strips UCs of their right to make their own reproductive choices,” Chutkan claimed in her decision. 

Advertisement

Related:

ACLU

Brigitte Amiri, an attorney with the ACLU’s Reproductive Freedom Project, responded Monday to the news that the Trump administration is appealing the ruling.

“Yet again, the Trump administration has doubled down on their extreme anti-abortion and anti-immigrant agenda,” she said in a statement. “We have no intention of backing down until we put an end to ORR’s coercive and unconstitutional ‘no-abortion’ policy.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos