Kamala Just Gave the Wrong Answer on The View
Biden Has Cancelled His International Trip
Harris Has a New Excuse for Her Policy Flip Flopping
There Is a Patriotic Energy
Wait, Trump Is Beating Kamala...With Arab Americans?
Prepare for Insane Media Spin on Ghost Gun Case Before Supreme Court
'Shark Tank' Star Says the US Must 'Bring China to Its Knees With...
Cook Political Report Makes a Ratings Change to Wisconsin Senate Race
RNC Notches Another Win for Election Integrity in Michigan
Kamala: 'Look at My Career to Know What I Care About'
Walz Offers Yet Another Excuse for His Lies
October 7 Was an American Calamity
Hurricane Aftermath Raises Election Strategy Suspicion
Mayorkas Was Questioned If FEMA Has Enough Resources for Hurricane Milton. Here's What...
Team Kamala: Gosh, We May Need to Distance Ourselves From Biden Some More
Tipsheet

Charmaine Yoest's SCOTUS Testimony

Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, opposed Kagan on the grounds that she "will be an agenda-driven judge on the  Court, and that she will strongly oppose even the most widely-accepted protections  for unborn human life." Yoest also provided a number of reasons as to why pro-life judges are so important to the Court and to our country.
Advertisement

...people who favor and people who oppose abortion rights agree that Roe is fundamentally a  policy decision, without Constitutional language to support it.  In fact, the Supreme Court has substantially modified the doctrine announced in Roe in subsequent cases.

As then-Chairman Specter stated in Chief Justice Roberts’ hearing, Roe is “the central issue which perhaps concerns most Americans.”  AUL agrees, and we believe that Americans should know whether Kagan is able to recognize the problems with Roe and its progeny. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement