Did This Issue Catapult Japanese Conservatives to a Landslide Win in Their Elections?
US Women's Hockey Team Clubbed the Canadians Like Baby Seals Yesterday. Oh, and...
Lisa Murkowski Just Stabbed Her Party in the Back on the SAVE Act
Why This Girl Wrestler Had Shock and Horror All Over Her Face? It's...
Bill Maher Reveals Why He Got the COVID Vaccine...and He's Rather Annoyed About...
Iran Is Preparing for a US Airstrike – Here's What Trump Is Saying
Man's Best Friend: Mystery Dog Helps Louisville Police Find Missing Toddler
Sen. Alex Padilla Gets Dragged for Sharing a Letter From Detained Migrant Child
The January Jobs Report Is Here
TX State Rep. Harrison Calls for Gene Wu to Be Stripped of Committee...
Check Out This Ridiculous Axios Headline About Plummeting Crime Rates
Police Released Person of Interest Detained in Guthrie Disappearance. Here's What We Know.
Report: The FAA Closed El Paso Airspace After Mexican Cartel Drone Incursion; Airspace...
Justice Jackson Defends Her Grammys Appearance As 'Part of the Job'
Steve Hilton Promises a ‘Political Revolution’ in California, and He’s Leading in the...
Tipsheet

Just Hours After SCOTUS Ruling, They Filed Another Challenge to Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

Well, that didn’t take long. Just hours after the Supreme Court ruled against nationwide injunctions, the group that sued the White House over President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship has filed another lawsuit challenging the order.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Friday issued a significant ruling barring federal judges from issuing nationwide injunctions on the White House’s policies. The Court held that such actions can only apply to the actual plaintiffs in a particular case.

The majority asserted that the power to issue broad rulings must align with what courts were allowed to do at the time the Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 were established. However, the ruling still allows for class-action lawsuits to be filed. Plaintiffs must go through the proper process for filing such a legal action.

That’s exactly what CASA, the nonprofit immigrant advocacy group that sued the administration, is trying to do. In an emergency court filing, the organization and other plaintiffs are asking the US District Court in Maryland to block Trump’s Executive Order denying birthright citizenship to children born in the US after February 19, 2025. 

Advertisement

The plaintiffs want a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction covering “All children who have been born or will be born in the United States on or after February 19, 2025, who are designated by Executive Order 14,160, to be ineligible for birthright citizenship, and their parents,” according to court documents.

CASA’s lawyers insist that Trump’s order is unconstitutional and that the high court “easily [found] the standard for a preliminary injunction” had been met. They further argue that the order would leave newborns “stateless—placing them at risk of removal and potential separation from other members of their family” while causing “an irreparable injury” to those affected.

Members of the Trump administration celebrated the Supreme Court’s ruling during a Friday press conference shortly after the Supreme Court handed down a series of rulings favorable to the White House. Attorney General Pam Bondi excoriated Democrats for weaponizing the judiciary against the president.

"Activist liberal justices have used these injunctions to block virtually all of President Trump’s policies,” Bondi said. “To put this in perspective, there are 94 federal judicial districts. 5 of those districts throughout this country held 35 of the nationwide injunctions....35 out of the 40 opinions with nationwide injunctions came from five liberal districts in this country. No longer."

Advertisement

Still, this does not mean Trump’s executive order regarding birthright citizenship is safe. If CASA transforms its legal action into a class-action lawsuit, then the issue will continue to be litigated. This one might also make it to the Supreme Court, which will ultimately decide whether the policy survives legal scrutiny.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement