Both These Men Tweeted at the Creator of Dilbert...and Shared a Horrific Fate
Law Professor Responds to Steve Bannon's Criticism of Biden Impeachment Inquiry
Jamaal Bowman's Failure at Reading Comprehension Should Cost Him
Another Blue State Governor Is Freaking Out Over the Number of Illegal Immigrants
The President Who Wasn’t There
Trump and the Revenge Vote
Washington's Credit Card Price Controls Will Hurt Consumers
Honest Talk on Immigration
The Viral Moment From Trump's Civil Fraud Trial
Tucker Carlson Makes a 2024 Prediction
Pentagon Official Charged With Running Dogfighting Ring
Is the Republican Race Finished? Is America?
The Trump Bullet Train to Nowhere Good
A Congressman Got Carjacked in DC Last Night
With Pretrial Ruling on Trump’s Businesses, Judges Eviscerate the Law to Take Down...

By the Way, Obama Just Endorsed Single Payer Healthcare

Former President Barack Obama made headlines last Friday when he broke from longstanding tradition to re-enter the partisan fray, offering direct and harsh criticisms of his successor in a public address.  Over the course of his lecture, he also blasted the Republican Party writ large: "Over the past few decades, the politics of division, of resentment and paranoia has unfortunately found a home in the Republican Party," he intoned.  Out of curiosity, to what would Obama ascribe this 2006 polling, showing that a majority of Democrats believed President Bush had advanced knowledge of the 9/11 terrorist attacks?  Or much more recent polls showing that most Democratic voters believe the baseless conspiracy theory that the Russian government changed actual votes in the 2016 US election?  


It would seem that division, resentment and paranoia have all found a home in the Democratic Party, too.  But tendentious partisanship masquerading as thoughtful, above-the-fray truth telling is vintage Obama.  I suspect his reappearance (did he ever really go away?) will motivate certain voters both for and against Democrats at the margins, but won't have too much of an impact overall.  Republicans will be reminded of how tiresome he can be, and hyper-motivated Democrats will...applaud vigorously and fortify their motivation.  In any case, on the policy front, this shift from Obama was inevitable, but is still noteworthy:

In a well-publicized speech this afternoon, the former Commander in Chief praised the bright ideas of his party's progressive wing. "Democrats aren't just running on good old ideas like a higher minimum wage, they're running on good new ideas like Medicare-for-all," Obama said in his remarks, while also endorsing proposals like giving workers seats on corporate boards and reversing tax cuts.

This idea is neither "new" nor good. But it is entirely predictable coming from Barack Obama. When conservatives warned that Obamacare was a scheme designed to push the country closer to fully government-run healthcare, that was dismissed as fear-mongering -- or perhaps even as the promulgation of, say, division, paranoia and resentment.   In spite of some powerful evidence, including Obama's own stated views on single-payer, these concerns were downplayed and written off by many in the press.  But Obamacare is failing (something else we also anticipated), and was objectively failing long before the "Republican sabotage" narrative was even remotely plausible.  The law shattered multiple central promises on which it was dishonestly sold to the public, not the least of which was the "Affordable" piece of the so-called "Affordable Care Act."  Many on the Left are pointing to these shortcomings as supposed proof that more government intervention is needed to further reshape the system in a "fair" way that guarantees that healthcare as a "human right."  


Obama now recognizes this leftward lurch as the wave of the future, and has effectively abandoned his own sputtering, fatally-flawed law in favor of a more complete state takeover of the healthcare sector.  Never mind that there's absolutely no way to pay for it without sweeping, bruising tax increases on middle income and working class.  Never mind that it would out government bureaucrats in charge of medical decisions, including rationing.  Never mind that our existing, massive government healthcare programs are failing, rife with abuse, and/or going insolvent.  Never mind that a dramatic shift to single payer would uproot more than 150 million Americans from their current healthcare arrangements.  These are all mere details to those who put blind faith in the government, some of whom would like to see the entrenched federal bureaucracy wield more control over people's lives.  The Democratic Party's increasingly-dominant left flank is happy to ignore glaring state-level failures and rejections, impose this utopic scheme, then figure out the nettlesome details later.  In some cases, that last bit isn't even an exaggeration:


That appears to be the attitude of California's next governor, as well.  To paraphrase Nike's new marketing ploy: "Implement something, even if it means bankrupting everything.  Just do it."  I'll leave you with this: Despite the GOP's disastrous standing in the state, might Golden State voters be having second thoughts about ongoing left-wing governance, even as Resistance fever runs high?  Oh, and here's just one more inconvenient, buzzkill reminder about the overwhelmingly daunting math:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos