Trump Scored a HUGE Election Integrity Win Last Night
Marco Rubio Just Gave a Speech About the Rise of Left-Wing Violence...and This...
Wait, That's Who Is Going to Be on a Panel That Screens NY...
GOP Holding Firm in State Attorneys General Races
Is This Why Abigail Spanberger's Approval Ratings Are in the Toilet?
James Talarico's Smear Job on Ken Paxton Crashed and Burned When a Victim's...
How Speaker Mike Johnson Will Save the SAVE America Act
The Lure of Cheating the Government Without Penalty
Mamdani's Regime Is About to Destroy Small Businesses and His Cronies Are Bragging...
Private Equity Didn't Kill the Patient
Brightline Is a Boondoggle—Secretary Duffy Must Not Give It Another Bailout
When Friends Stand Together
Indian Americans Are Proud to Be Part of America’s 250-Year Story
Democrats Search for Graham Platner’s Runner-Up
Taxing the Wealthy Can’t Fund Social Security Into Solvency
Tipsheet

A Reporter Accused the US of Potential War Crimes in Iran. Here's What the Secretary of War Had to Say.

A Reporter Accused the US of Potential War Crimes in Iran. Here's What the Secretary of War Had to Say.
AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

A journalist got a brutal reality check after suggesting the United States could be committing a war crime following President Trump's remarks, Wednesday that strikes against Iran's bridges and electrical infrastructure were back on the table. The clash comes as the Trump administration has resumed strikes on Iranian targets after an attack on an Apache helicopter that was shot down over the Strait of Hormuz.

Advertisement

When pressed on the issue, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth dismissed the question as "disingenuous" and reiterated that the U.S. military would pursue actions necessary to achieve its objectives in the conflict. Under the law of armed conflict, attacks on bridges are not inherently considered war crimes, and while strikes on electrical infrastructure raise additional legal considerations because of their potential impact on civilians, targeting such facilities is also not automatically a war crime.

"If the response is in hitting bridges, electrical infrastructure, how would that not be a war crime potentially targeting civilian infrastructure?" a reporter asked.

"Well, it's precisely the kind of disingenuous question that I'm used to from the media, impugning the motives of the folks on our side who are incredibly professional and incredibly effective," the Secretary of War said. "We will hit them hard on our terms, on the targets that improve the environment for us to operate in and undermine the capabilities that Iran wants to have."

"Again, they can't do that to us meaningfully the way that we can to them, but we're also clearly signaling to them, you have a choice," Hegseth continued. "You have a choice in the way that you respond, and you have a choice with our incredible negotiating team in Steve Whitkoff and Jared Kushner and the vice president and the president across the board prepared, Marco Rubio, the whole team prepared to make a great deal that would benefit Iran. They choose not to, and as a result, they're going to meet United States Central Command again tonight in the way the president laid out clearly."

Advertisement

This comes after President Trump put strikes on critical Iranian infrastructure back on the table following the reported downing of an American aircraft over the Strait of Hormuz. The two pilots were rescued alive and unharmed within hours, and the United States has since resumed strikes against Iranian military targets.

Editor's Note: For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all. 

Help us report the truth about the Trump administration's decisive actions to keep Americans safe and bring peace to the world. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement