The Dem Trans Mafia Will Never Rest
Don Lemon: MAGA Supporters Are Nazis, but Without the Holocaust Stuff
Why This Dem Rep Had to Leave the House Progressive Caucus Is Not...
AOC 2028? When You Think About It, She's Really All the Dems Have
WNBA's Issue With Viral Meme of Sophie Cunningham Once Again Proves This League...
Nancy Pelosi Says She’s ‘Done’
Donald Trump, Dave McCormick, and Jamie Dimon Unveil a Massive Manufacturing Push in...
Islam and the Left Will Both Bring Tyranny
Who Are Our Domestic Enemies?
The World Is Collapsing—or Is It?
Supporting Our Troops Means More Than Saying 'Thank You'
Trump Voters Want Washington to Put Guardrails on Financial Data Sharing
Why Europeans Get Long Paid Vacations—and We Don’t
No Shame: Big Pharma Using Illegal Immigration Issue to Trick Conservatives Into Dancing...
Another Conspiracy Theory Proven Right
Tipsheet

Federal Court Rejects Trump Admin's Bid to Delay EPA Regulation on Drilling

Federal Court Rejects Trump Admin's Bid to Delay EPA Regulation on Drilling

President Trump scored a court victory last week when the Supreme Court reinstated part of his controversial travel order. It was a win for national security, he and his supporters cheered. Yet, his deregulatory agenda hit a snag in the courts Monday, as the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that his administration cannot delay EPA rules put in place by Obama to limit drilling.

Advertisement

Obama's EPA set out to place methane emissions standards at drilling sites. Environmentalists argue it is a necessary mandate to prevent leaks of a powerful greenhouse gas and other pollutants, reports The Hill. Yet, the Trump administration aimed to change course, charging that the rules were unfair to stakeholders who had no opportunity to comment on some parts of the final regulation.

Yet, the rule must stand, according to the circuit court judges.

“The administrative record thus makes clear that industry groups had ample opportunity to comment on all four issues on which EPA granted reconsideration, and indeed, that in several instances the agency incorporated those comments directly into the final rule,” two of the judges on the three-judge panel wrote.

“Because it was thus not ‘impracticable’ for industry groups to have raised such objections during the notice and comment period [the Clean Air Act] did not require reconsideration and did not authorize the stay.”
Advertisement

The EPA, led by Administrator Scott Pruitt, has not been totally stymied by the court, however. The agency is on his way to rolling back at least 30 Obama-era regulations. One of the most notable reversals so far was President Trump's decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords - a deal Trump said would have badly damaged our economy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement