*This* Is Why the ICE Agent Opened Fire on the Driver That Reportedly...
Is This THE Video Showing That White Liberal Women Are the Worst?
'It's My Fault': Partner of Leftist Driver Who Tried to Ram ICE Agents...
Whatever Is Going on in Iran, Trump Issued This Direct Warning to the...
CIRCUS: Did You Miss Tim Walz Contradicting Himself Over the Minneapolis ICE Shooting?
Of Course, an ABC Analyst Smeared the ICE Agent Involved in the Shooting...
Taking Action on Walz’s Minnesota Fraud Scandal
Target Hasn't Completely Dumped the Woke Nonsense
Oregon Democrats Defend Violent Venezuelan Gang Member After Another ICE-Involved Shooting...
Venezuelans Are Trolling Maduro in Prison, and It's Glorious
'Seeking Peace:' President Trump Reports Venezuela Is Releasing 'Large Number' of Politica...
Wisconsin Man Pleads Guilty After Killing Parents to Finance Trump Assassination Plan
In Mamdani's New York, Cheering for Hamas Is Now the Norm
Should Capitalism Have Any Guardrails?
The Uncontainable Embers of Iran’s Uprising
Tipsheet

Federal Court Rejects Trump Admin's Bid to Delay EPA Regulation on Drilling

President Trump scored a court victory last week when the Supreme Court reinstated part of his controversial travel order. It was a win for national security, he and his supporters cheered. Yet, his deregulatory agenda hit a snag in the courts Monday, as the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that his administration cannot delay EPA rules put in place by Obama to limit drilling.

Advertisement

Obama's EPA set out to place methane emissions standards at drilling sites. Environmentalists argue it is a necessary mandate to prevent leaks of a powerful greenhouse gas and other pollutants, reports The Hill. Yet, the Trump administration aimed to change course, charging that the rules were unfair to stakeholders who had no opportunity to comment on some parts of the final regulation.

Yet, the rule must stand, according to the circuit court judges.

“The administrative record thus makes clear that industry groups had ample opportunity to comment on all four issues on which EPA granted reconsideration, and indeed, that in several instances the agency incorporated those comments directly into the final rule,” two of the judges on the three-judge panel wrote.

“Because it was thus not ‘impracticable’ for industry groups to have raised such objections during the notice and comment period [the Clean Air Act] did not require reconsideration and did not authorize the stay.”
Advertisement

The EPA, led by Administrator Scott Pruitt, has not been totally stymied by the court, however. The agency is on his way to rolling back at least 30 Obama-era regulations. One of the most notable reversals so far was President Trump's decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords - a deal Trump said would have badly damaged our economy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos