Caracas in Ruins: Up to 100,000 Feared Dead As Massive Earthquakes Rock Venezuela
Politician Physically Attacking the Press Is Met With Press Silence—It Is (D)ifferent, You...
The Left Learned It's Not Above the Law
Stephen Miller Slams Judge Who Blocked Expedited Access to Wisconsin's Voter Rolls
After New York's Socialist Sweep, Don't Forget Where This 'Moderate' Democrat Stands
Trump Declares 'America Is Back' at America250 Kickoff
Four Charged in Scheme to Profit Off NYC Migrant Housing Crisis
Illegal Alien Charged With Stealing American's Identity, Bilking $800K From Taxpayers
Denmark Exploring Ban on Islamic Call to Prayer
National SNAP Improper Payments Hit $10B in FY 2025
NC Man Sentenced to 8 Years for Trying to Join ISIS, Fight U.S....
Pittsburgh Convenience Store Duo Charged in $550K SNAP-for-Cash Scheme
Trump Was in 'Pretty Heavy Duty' Iran Talks During Controversial War Powers Vote,...
Four Years Ago, SCOTUS Gave Life a Major Win, and Democrats Are Still...
Trump Demands SAVE America Act Passage in Rare Capitol Hill Meeting
Tipsheet

GOP Lawsuit Against Obamacare Gets Green Light

GOP Lawsuit Against Obamacare Gets Green Light

On Wednesday, Federal District Judge Rosemary Collyer gave House Republicans hope that their fight against Obamacare is not over. Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) has been pursuing a lawsuit against the president’s health care legislation, one that would hold his administration accountable for spending “billions of unappropriated dollars” that were never approved by Congress. The judge allowed this claim to go forward, offering the following explanation:

Advertisement

“The only issue before the Court is whether the House can sue the Secretaries; the merits of this lawsuit await another day. Although no precedent dictates the outcome, the case implicates the constitutionality of another Branch’s actions and thus merits an ‘especially rigorous’ standing analysis. Ariz. State Legislature v. Ariz. Indep. Redistricting Comm’n, 135 S. Ct. 2652, 2665 n. 12 (2015). The House sues, as an institutional plaintiff, to preserve its power of the purse and to maintain constitutional equilibrium between the Executive and the Legislature. If its non-appropriation claims have merit, which the Secretaries deny, the House has been injured in a concrete and particular way that is traceable to the Secretaries and remediable in court. The Court concludes that the House has standing to pursue those constitutional claims,” Collyer wrote.

Not all of Boehner’s claims were met, however:

Collyer rejected the second piece of the GOP’s lawsuit, in which Boehner contested the Department of the Treasury’s decision to waive a requirement for employers to provide health insurance without consulting Congress.

The House’s claims “concern only the implementation of a statute, not adherence to any specific constitutional requirement,” Collyers wrote in dismissing the claim.

Advertisement

The Obama administration bitterly dismissed the lawsuit:

"This case is just another partisan attack, and we believe that ultimately the courts will dismiss it for what it is — an inappropriate attempt to involve the judiciary in disputes between the other branches," she wrote.

The GOP has faced several setbacks in its effort to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. Their latest defeat came in June, when the Supreme Court upheld the law’s federal health care subsidies.

Despite these endless hurdles, Republicans, including several presidential candidates, have insisted they’re not giving up in their goal to dismantle the federal mandate.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement