Read a Venezuelan Guard's 'Chilling' Account About the Delta Force Raid That Nabbed...
Watch What Happens When This Leftist Protester Accosts a CNN Reporter in Minneapolis
Is This Why the Media Isn't Covering the Iran Protests?
We’re in a Slow-Rolling Civil War, President Trump Needs to Recognize It
Knoxville Orchestra Plays Sour Notes of Racial Preference over Talent
ICE Stories They Don’t Tell You
They Can Hate Israel All They Want
The Consequences of Leftist Lawlessness
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 302: What the Bible Says About Pain
While Democrats Promote Hoaxes, Republicans Must Stand for Truth
Leftist Agitators Stalk and Threaten to Kill Journalist Covering Minneapolis Unrest
Minneapolis Radicals Begin Distributing Devices to Disable ICE Vehicles
Sons of Liberty, Sons of Legacy: Forming the Men Who Will Shape America’s...
Banning the Muslim Brotherhood: A Good Start, Part 2
The Problem of Clergy Sowing Discord
Tipsheet

Pay Attention, Dems: Jim Jordan Drops A Huge Truth Bomb About 'Political Surveillance'

AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

The House Judiciary Committee is preparing to vote on whether or not to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress. The Democrats are unhappy because Barr refuses to release a full unredacted version of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report.

Advertisement

The document that has been made public has very few redactions. The redactions that did take place fall under four categories: (1) grand-jury information, which, by law, cannot be made public; (2) investigative techniques that could harm ongoing intelligence or law enforcement activities; (3) information that, if released, could harm ongoing law enforcement matters, including charged cases where court rules and orders bar public disclosure by the parties of case information; and (4) information that would unduly infringe upon the personal privacy and reputitional interests of peripheral third parties.

Before the House Judiciary Committee makes their official vote, various members of the Committee made statements. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) delivered a fiery speech about the Democrats' attacks on Barr, despite his best efforts to be transparent while following the rule of law.

"Bill Barr is following the law and what's his reward? Democrats are going to hold him in contempt," Jordan said. "I don't think today is about getting information. I don't think it's about getting the unredacted Mueller report. I don't think last week's hearing was actually about staff questioning the attorney general. I think it's, as my colleague said earlier, I think it's all about trying to destroy Bill Barr because Democrats are nervous he's going to get to the bottom of everything. He's going to get to the bottom of how and why this investigation started in the first place."

Jordan reiterated a point Barr made a few weeks ago: there were massive failures at the head of the FBI. It's why FBI Director James Comey and FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe were fired. It's why FBI General Counsel left the department and is undergoing investigation. It's why Lisa Paige and Peter Strzok left the department. 

Advertisement

"There was certainly a failure of leadership at the upper echelon of the FBI," Jordan said.

But he also reminded Committee members of one important tidbit: Barr said spying did occur and his concern about said spying is warranted. 

"He said, in his judgement, he thinks there may have been unauthorized surveillance and political surveillance. Scary terms," Jordan said.

He also said something his colleagues probably hadn't thought of: each and every one of them should want Barr to investigate these surveillance issues because it could happen to any one of them.

"In the partisan commotion surrounding the Mueller report, it would be well to remember what can be done to a president can be done any of us," he said. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement