This Media Outlet Just Sued the Pentagon Over its New Policy
Tim Walz Can Dish It Out, but He Can't Take It
Guess How Many Democrats Voted Against Protecting Our Schools From Chinese Influence
Pope Leo Tells Europeans Worried About Islam to Be Less Fearful
Occam's Bazooka
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 297: Biblical Time Keeping – BC and AD...
Democratic Lawmakers Big Mad That Trump Admin is Fighting NarcoTerrorists
Trump Admin Sweeping Minneapolis For Illegals After Somali Fraud Exposed
Maryland Man Sentenced for Scheme Helping Foreign IT Workers Pose as U.S. Citizens
Arizona Father-Son Duo Sentenced for Massive Cross-Border Narcotics and Money Laundering S...
Two Miami Men Get 57 Months for Nationwide Sale of Diverted HIV and...
Federal Jury Finds Texas Resident Guilty in $150K PEMEX Bribery Plot
Another Person Stabbed on Charlotte Light Rail; Illegal Alien Arrested
The Dangerous Joy of Christmas: Standing With Persecuted Christians This Season
America First, Christian Nationalism, and Antisemitism
Tipsheet

Pay Attention, Dems: Jim Jordan Drops A Huge Truth Bomb About 'Political Surveillance'

AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

The House Judiciary Committee is preparing to vote on whether or not to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress. The Democrats are unhappy because Barr refuses to release a full unredacted version of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report.

Advertisement

The document that has been made public has very few redactions. The redactions that did take place fall under four categories: (1) grand-jury information, which, by law, cannot be made public; (2) investigative techniques that could harm ongoing intelligence or law enforcement activities; (3) information that, if released, could harm ongoing law enforcement matters, including charged cases where court rules and orders bar public disclosure by the parties of case information; and (4) information that would unduly infringe upon the personal privacy and reputitional interests of peripheral third parties.

Before the House Judiciary Committee makes their official vote, various members of the Committee made statements. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) delivered a fiery speech about the Democrats' attacks on Barr, despite his best efforts to be transparent while following the rule of law.

"Bill Barr is following the law and what's his reward? Democrats are going to hold him in contempt," Jordan said. "I don't think today is about getting information. I don't think it's about getting the unredacted Mueller report. I don't think last week's hearing was actually about staff questioning the attorney general. I think it's, as my colleague said earlier, I think it's all about trying to destroy Bill Barr because Democrats are nervous he's going to get to the bottom of everything. He's going to get to the bottom of how and why this investigation started in the first place."

Jordan reiterated a point Barr made a few weeks ago: there were massive failures at the head of the FBI. It's why FBI Director James Comey and FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe were fired. It's why FBI General Counsel left the department and is undergoing investigation. It's why Lisa Paige and Peter Strzok left the department. 

Advertisement

"There was certainly a failure of leadership at the upper echelon of the FBI," Jordan said.

But he also reminded Committee members of one important tidbit: Barr said spying did occur and his concern about said spying is warranted. 

"He said, in his judgement, he thinks there may have been unauthorized surveillance and political surveillance. Scary terms," Jordan said.

He also said something his colleagues probably hadn't thought of: each and every one of them should want Barr to investigate these surveillance issues because it could happen to any one of them.

"In the partisan commotion surrounding the Mueller report, it would be well to remember what can be done to a president can be done any of us," he said. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement