New Emails Might Suggest Ukraine Whistleblower Covered Up Biden Family Dealings
Biden Can't Capitalize on His Supposed 'Superpower' for 2024
Yale Student Stabbed at Pro-Hamas Demonstration Describes How the Campus Is a Terror...
Is Hollywood Unwokening?
Capitalism Versus Racism
Groupthink Chorus Emerges at Trump Trial
Is the FBI Monitoring These Pro-Terrorist Student Demonstrations?
Mike Johnson Is a Hero
City Where Emergency Response Time Is 36 Minutes Wants to Ban Civilians Carrying...
The Alarming Implications of Trump's Immunity Claim
Everything We Know About the Latest Would-Be Trans Shooter
In Every Generation They Try to Destroy Us
Love to See It: Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Ted Cruz Fight to Protect Public...
1968 Returns as Biden’s Nightmare
The Greatest Challenge to DeSantis' Legacy in Florida
Tipsheet

New Defense Bill Exceeds Trump’s Request

In his interview with Christian Broadcast Network's Pat Robertson, President Trump mused that Russia would have been much happier if his opponent Hillary Clinton had won. She would have "depleted" the U.S. military, he said. Trump intends to build our defense, he said. The new National Defense Authorization Act that passed Friday suggests that he meant what he said.

Advertisement

The $696 billion bill, which passed in a vote of 344-81, will provide the military with more resources to produce more ships, aircraft, as well as allow for troop increases. In May, Trump proposed $603 billion in military build up, meaning Congress exceeded his expectations.

The House-passed NDAA bill would add 17,000 soldiers to the Army, something requested by the service but unfunded under the president's budget, as well as authorize purchase of four additional Navy ships, 17 more F-35 fighter jets, and eight more F/A-18 Super Hornet jets. The House bill is comprised of two sections, one that would authorize $631.6 billion in base defense spending, and $65 billion in overseas war spending.

As always, the NDAA didn't pass without some serious hurdles and controversies. For instance, conservatives were uncomfortable with an Obama-era provision that provided funding for transgender troops. 

Advertisement

Obama's "transgender decision is costly in dollars and short on common sense," Republicans like Rep. Vicky Vicky Hartzler (R-MO) argued, adding that if the provision remains, taxpayers will be subject to paying for transition surgeries and hormone treatments. However, the effort was defeated and the funding for transgender medical care remains in place.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement