Terrorists Launch Attacks on Americans Building Biden’s Gaza Pier
The Pro-Hamas Activist Who Accosted Alec Baldwin Went Totally Insane During Piers Morgan...
Police at UT Austin Had the Perfect Response to a Pro-Hamas Activist Flipping...
Iran-Backed Terrorists Resume Attacks on U.S. Service Members in the Middle East
White House Attempt to Cover for Biden's Latest Gaffe Might Be Its Most...
Stocks Tank After Disastrous First Quarter GDP Report
US, 17 Other Nations Issue Joint Statement Calling on Hamas to Release Hostages
Florida Has Carried Out an Impressive Evacuation Operation in Haiti
Biden Administration's New Overtime Rule Blasted as an 'Attack on Small Businesses'
Students at Another Ivy League University Get Ready to Set Up Encampment
The Left Would Prosecute Trump for Acts He Never Committed, But Obama Did
Another Poll on Battleground States Is Here to Toss Cold Water on Biden's...
Could Texas Ban ‘Gender Nonconforming’ Teachers From Schools?
Should Republicans Be Concerned About the Pennsylvania Primary Results?
Mike Davis' Internet Accountability Project Calls on Senate Republicans to Break Up Big...
Tipsheet

Veronica Capobianco, Subject of Supreme Court Case, Returned to Adoptive Parents

Veronica Capobianco, the subject of the recent Supreme Court case Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl has returned to her adoptive parents following a lengthy custody battle and an intense debate over Native American and parenthood rights.

Advertisement

Veronica was born to Christy Maldonado, an unmarried mother, and was adopted at birth by Melanie and Matt Capobianco, who were picked by Maldonado to adopt her child. An open adoption agreement was made. For two years Veronica lived with Melanie and Matt until her biological father, Dusten Brown, launched a custody claim using the Indian Child Welfare Act. Brown is a registered Cherokee, and had previously told Maldonado that he did not want to be Veronica’s father via text message.

Maldonado is a Latina woman.

The Indian Child Welfare Act mandates that a tribe approve of any adoption to a non-native couple. The Capobiancos were non-native, and the Cherokee Nation had not given approval to Veronica’s adoption. A judge in South Carolina granted custody to Brown, and Veronica was taken from the Capobiancos and given to Brown, whom she had never met. The law was written in the 1970s to prevent the breakup of Native American families.

The Capobiancos argued that because Brown had not supported Maldonado during her pregnancy (one of the qualifications to claim parenthood), had signed away his parental rights to avoid paying child support, and never actually had custody of Veronica prior to the South Carolina Supreme Court decision, the Indian Child Welfare Act did not apply in this case. In a split 5-4 decision in June, the United States Supreme Court opined that Brown was not the father of Veronica, and then remanded the case to South Carolina, who placed Veronica in the custody of the Capobiancos.

Advertisement

Brown then refused to return Veronica to the Capobiancos, and did not appear at several court hearings regarding her custody. Finally, on Sept. 23, 2013, Veronica was returned to the home her mother picked out for her.

Maldonado and several other mothers have filed a lawsuit asking Attorney General Eric Holder to declare parts of the Indian Child Welfare Act unconstitutional.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement