There are few crimes more evil than those committed against children. I might be a little biased on that, but only the most disgusting people in our population actually look at crimes like sexually assaulting children as somehow being no big deal, and I really think the FBI should be looking at those people's hard drives anyway.
It's a crime that should be treated seriously. Anyone who thinks otherwise, well...see comments about the FBI and hard drives.
Unfortunately, a George Soros-backed attorney seems to view things differently.
Richard Leigh Bell, 37, of Austin, Texas, stood accused of numerous sexual crimes against children. The charges he faced were one count of continuous sexual abuse of a child under 14, six counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child, and two counts of indecency with a child.
In other words, he's someone who, if found guilty, would deserve literally anything the state of Texas did to him.
Unfortunately, Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza apparently doesn't think so. His office entered a plea deal with Bell, where he'll plead guilty to one count of injury to a child and get three years of deferred probation. He'll apparently still have to register as a sex offender, but that's small potatoes compared to what he was accused of doing.
What's more, whoever was responsible for prosecuting the case has to feel that Bell is guilty; otherwise, why prosecute him at all?
So, Garza or his employee figures that Bell did the heinous acts he's accused of, but they are going to put him right back out on the streets just the same.
I wish this were an isolated incident, but Soros-backed prosecutors have a long and storied history of allowing criminal behavior to be perpetuated in our cities. Maybe not to this extreme in most cases, but can anyone who has been paying attention really be that surprised?
Recommended
It's one thing to disagree on issues like welfare, abortion, gun control, and a host of others, but protecting our children and our communities from dangerous people shouldn't be a topic up for debate. How best to do that might be, but can't we all agree that anyone with a series of charges like what Bell faced is someone who belongs locked in a room where we throw away the key?
And only a fool will believe that Soros will be so upset by this that Garza won't get his support going forward.
For a long time, it was hard for me to truly wrap my head around the rhetoric about Soros. I just couldn't believe anyone would support people like this knowingly. However, the truth was too obvious for even my optimistic backside to ignore forever.
Soros and progressives as a whole, despite screaming incessantly about the Epstein files – something they never once mentioned until Trump took office, especially when Biden could have released them at any time – are not interested in the suffering and exploitation of young Americans or any other young people throughout the world. They care nothing about that, and we know it because we've seen it a thousand times, at least.
Progressive school boards and administrators protect predators in our schools by moving them around the system or, at worst, firing them in such a way that there's no blemish on their records, allowing them to go to other schools and continue their predatory ways. They defend pedophiles and create a new, less terrifying term. You can call them "minor attracted people" all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that they're pedophiles who should never be allowed to roam free in society.
If Garza loses his next election, it won't be because the progressive powers figure he's done horrible things. It'll be because the voters were the ones who paid the price, and they're sick of it.
And Soros will just keep on funding terrible prosecutors.
I won't say that George Soros is trying to destabilize the nation with his billions by backing destabilizing candidates. I'm just saying that if that's what he wanted to do, I can't think of a single thing he would do differently.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member