Oh, So That's Why DOJ Isn't Going After Pro-Terrorism Agitators
The UN Endorses a Second Terrorist State for Iran
Jihad Joe
Israeli Ambassador Shreds the U.N. Charter in Powerful Speech Before Vote to Grant...
New Single Article of Impeachment Filed Against Biden
GOP Reps Sound the Alarm Over Foreign Entities Using ESG to Undermine American...
New Report Details How Dems Are Planning to Minimize Risk of Pro-Hamas Disruptions...
The Long Haul of Love
Left-Wing Mayor Hires Drag Queen to Spearhead 'Transgender Initiatives'
NewsNation Border Patrol Ride Along Sees Arrest of Illegal Immigrants in Illustration of...
One State Just Cut Off Funding for Planned Parenthood
Vulnerable Democratic Senators Refuse to Support Commonsense Pro-Life Bill
California Surf Competition Will Be Required to Allow Men to Compete Against Women
MSNBC Left Sputtering Over Poll's Findings on Who Independent Voters Worry Will 'Weaken...
Biden's New Low
OPINION

Is Joe Biden Over the Horizon?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez

On April 14, 2021, President Joe Biden announced that, in keeping with an agreement former President Donald Trump had made with the Taliban, he would be removing all U.S. military forces from Afghanistan.

Advertisement

"We went to Afghanistan in 2001 to root out al Qaeda, to prevent future terrorist attacks against the United States planned from Afghanistan," Biden said. "Our objective was clear. The cause was just."

"I believed that our presence in Afghanistan should be focused on the reason we went in the first place: to ensure Afghanistan would not be used as a base from which to attack our homeland again," Biden said.

He was indisputably right about this. The ultimate reason for our intervention in Afghanistan was "to ensure Afghanistan would not be used as a base from which to attack our homeland again."

Biden then assured Americans that his administration would work from "over the horizon" to make sure this was the case.

"But we'll not take our eye off the terrorist threat," Biden said. "We'll reorganize our counterterrorism capabilities and the substantial assets in the region to prevent reemergence of terrorists-of the threat to our homeland from over the horizon."

Biden set Sept. 11, 2021, as the deadline for the U.S. withdrawal.

On Aug. 15, the Taliban seized Kabul.

On Aug. 26, an ISIS-Khorasan suicide bomber killed 13 U.S. troops and, according to the Congressional Research Service, "more than 150 Afghans" outside the Kabul airport.

Advertisement

On Aug. 30, Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie, commander of U.S. Central Command, conducted a video press briefing.

"I am here to announce the completion of our withdrawal from Afghanistan and the end of the military mission to evacuate American citizens, third country nationals and vulnerable Afghans," said McKenzie. "The last C-17 lifted off from Hamid Karzai International Airport on Aug. 30, this afternoon at 3:29 p.m. East Coast time and the last manned aircraft is now clearing the airspace above Afghanistan."

The next day, Biden delivered another address from the White House.

"Last night in Kabul, the United States ended 20 years of war in Afghanistan -- the longest war in American history," Biden said.

"We will maintain the fight against terrorism in Afghanistan and other countries," he said. "We just don't need to fight a ground war to do it. We have what's called over-the-horizon capabilities, which means we can strike terrorists and targets without American boots on the ground -- or very few, if needed."

So, did Biden order U.S. forces out of Afghanistan only after he had ensured that "Afghanistan would not be used as a base from which to attack our homeland again"?

Is he keeping America safe from Afghanistan-based terrorists?

Advertisement

In February, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released the 2022 "Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community."

It made some observations about Afghanistan and ISIS.

"Communal conflict, insurgency, and instability almost certainly will provide terrorist groups continued opportunities to recruit members, acquire funds, and establish or expand safe havens from which to plot attacks -- including reviving safe havens in Afghanistan," said the assessment.

"The threat from ISIS against U.S. persons and interests probably will remain greatest in regions where the group has an operational presence," said the assessment. "ISIS's ideology and propaganda, however, almost certainly will continue to inspire attacks in the West, including in the United States."

"In Afghanistan," said the assessment, "ISIS-Khorasan is attempting to exploit an influx of funds and personnel from prison breaks to undermine the Taliban and build an external attack capability if it can withstand Taliban pressure."

This week, McKenzie testified in the Senate Armed Services Committee.

"ISIS and AQ (al Qaeda) are seeking to exploit a reduction of U.S. CT (counter-terrorism) efforts in Afghanistan to reinvigorate their adherents and increase their ability to plot and direct external attacks," McKenzie said in written testimony.

Advertisement

"The Department of Defense assesses ISIS-K could establish an external attack capability against the United States and our allies in twelve to eighteen months, but possibly sooner if the group experiences unanticipated gains in Afghanistan," McKenzie said.

"AQ likely still aspires to recruit and train, and if successful, restore an external attack capability against the United States and our allies in twelve to twenty-four months," he told the committee.

"For the United States, conducting CT operations in Afghanistan from 'over the horizon' remains difficult, but not impossible," McKenzie said in his written testimony.

"The loss of collection following the withdrawal of U.S. forces has exacerbated gaps in our intelligence," he said. "This limits the intelligence community's ability to provide indications and warning of VEO (violent extremist organization) threats from Afghanistan. Also limited is the United States' ability to fix and finish those threats we are able to find. The resultant reductions in consistent CT pressure potentially could enable VEO groups to pose increased threats to the United States and our allies, assuming the Taliban is unwilling or unable to do so itself."

Republican Sen. Deb Fischer of Nebraska questioned McKenzie at the hearing.

Advertisement

"President Biden touted over-the-horizon counterterrorism operations as our new strategy to deal with the terrorist threat in Afghanistan," she said. "Gen. McKenzie, have we conducted any over-the-horizon strike against ISIS-K targets in Afghanistan since August of last year?"

"Senator," Gen. McKenzie responded, "we have conducted no strikes in Afghanistan."

"I will tell you we have not undertaken any strikes in Afghanistan since the first of September," McKenzie said later in the hearing. "We continue to watch carefully as ISIS grows. They have gone through the winter. They have been able to carry out some high-profile attacks.

"They still aspire to attack the United States and our partners abroad," said McKenzie.

But do not worry. President Biden will stop them from "over the horizon."

Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSnews.com.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos