Why Thomas Massie's Ex-Girlfriend Came Forward With This Hush Money Story
New Dem Survey Is a Middle Finger to Black Voters
These Students Want to Cancel a Speaker for Not Being Part of Their...
Bill Cassidy Goes After His Trump-Endorsed Opponent Over DEI – It's Not Going...
Three Reasons Why Virginia’s Redistricting Amendment Should Fail
Mall Brats
The Bipartisan Tax Relief Deal Is DOA Thanks to Wisconsin Democrats
Here's Why a Disabled Woman Is Suing the City of Portland
Nick Shirley Went to Cuba to Investigate Life Under Communism. Here's What He...
Fentanyl Playground: LA Is a Walking Campaign Ad for Spencer Pratt
Jim Jordan Torches Fairfax Commonwealth Attorney Over Quiet Website Change on Immigration...
Fox News Got Firsthand Experience With China's Surveillance State. Here's What Happened.
Here's Why Marco Rubio Has Long Been a Proponent of NATO and Why...
Democrats Are on the Wrong Side of History With AI: Fetterman Rips Into...
Trump Has the Cards for an AI Deal With China
OPINION

An Undocumented Foreigner and a Murder

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
An Undocumented Foreigner and a Murder
If you don't recognize the name Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, don't worry: You will. He's not a candidate for president, but before long he'll have higher name recognition than Jeb Bush.
Advertisement

A felon convicted on several drug charges, the Mexican national had been deported five times but managed to get back into the country. He has been arrested for the apparently random murder of 32-year-old Kate Steinle in San Francisco on July 1. For anti-immigration advocates, his case starkly exposes everything that is wrong with our immigration policies.

Those flaws would be: First, Lopez-Sanchez was here -- illustrating our unwillingness to secure the border. Second, he was (allegedly) violent, proving the danger that unauthorized immigrants pose to American citizens. Third, he was not held for federal immigration agents by the sheriff, an indictment of San Francisco's "sanctuary city" policy.

Donald Trump used this episode to buttress his claim that Mexico is sending criminals to the United States. Mark Krikorian, head of the conservative Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), said the tycoon's "widely mocked warnings of this very danger have been vindicated."

But what does this prove, exactly? It's no secret that anyone who is sufficiently determined to sneak into the country from Mexico can probably do so sooner or later.

That's not because enforcement is lax. Spending on border security has tripled, after adjustment for inflation, since 2000. The number of Border Patrol Agents has risen fivefold in the past two decades. Politicians act as though we could make the Mexican border impermeable. But recent experience shows that's a fantasy.

The accused is anything but representative of Mexican immigrants, documented or otherwise. Contrary to myth, this group is averse to violent crime as well as property crime. Noncitizens, who make up about 13 percent of the population, account for about 6 percent of all federal and state prison inmates. Many of them, of course, are not undocumented immigrants, but legal ones.

Advertisement

A 2008 study by economists Kristin Butcher of Wellesley College and Anne Morrison Piehl of Rutgers for the Public Policy Institute of California reported that people born abroad make up 35 percent of the state's adult population -- but only 17 percent of state prisoners.

"Noncitizen men from Mexico ages 18-40 -- a group disproportionately likely to have entered the United States illegally -- are more than eight times less likely than U.S.-born men in the same age group to be in a correctional setting," the authors found.

It's true that if Lopez-Sanchez were not in the country, he would not have been able to kill anyone. But if the presence of immigrants has a protective effect against crime in the neighborhoods where they live, as the evidence suggests, then there are murders that would have occurred but didn't because of their presence.

San Francisco does have a "sanctuary" law that prohibits local police from working with Immigrations and Customs Enforcement without a court order or warrant. Maybe in this case the city went too far -- or maybe the feds simply dropped the ball.

They turned the suspect over after he completed a federal prison term for trying to enter the country illegally. It would have made more sense to deport him. In any case, they apparently didn't take legal steps to make sure of getting him back when the city was done with him. Instead, they merely asked the city to hold him.

A court dismissed an outstanding charge against Lopez-Sanchez. Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi said he would have given him back to ICE if it had issued a warrant. Since it didn't, he let him go. Given that the inmate's record showed no violent crime convictions, though, his implication in a murder was hardly foreseeable.

Advertisement

The sanctuary policy, in any event, is not a mindless favor to felons, but an attempt to promote valuable cooperation between local immigrants and police. If otherwise law-abiding undocumented foreigners fear being apprehended by local cops on immigration violations, they aren't likely to help solve crimes. If they are assured the cops won't report them, they are more likely to come forward.

Mirkarimi knows something Trump and his allies refuse to learn: In advancing public safety, undocumented immigrants, when treated generously, are more helpful than harmful.

It's a shame that Lopez-Sanchez, if guilty, was not deported before he could commit this crime. But he proves no more about undocumented immigrants than John Lennon's killer proves about white guys named Chapman.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement