Why the NYT Had to Issue a Monster Correction for This Piece About...
Why This Huffington Post Reporter's Good Friday Tweet Was Quite Embarrassing
Here's What I Want From the Next Attorney General
Elon: ‘We Are Making Some Progress’
It’s Time for a 'King of Kings' March!
Pro-Russian Parties Lead in Bulgaria, Raising Stakes for Ukraine and the EU
AI Water Use? That’s a Hoax.
The Image of Keith Ellison
Petition for Government Spending Caps So Our Grandchildren Can Prosper
Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is? Union Leaders Still Making Political Donations...
With Omeed Assefi in Charge, America First Antitrust Is Alive and Well
The Day Nothing Happened — and Everything Changed
The White House Can Find Better AI Partners Than Ultra Woke Anthropic
America First Trading Policies Are Key to Defeating China
About That Viral Courtroom Meltdown in Harris County...
OPINION

The Government Shutdown That Democrats Love

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
The Government Shutdown That Democrats Love
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

One big word worth learning is "schadenfreude."

Schadenfreude is "pleasure derived by someone from another person's misfortune."

Nothing better captures the perverse pleasure that Democrats are deriving from the pain inflicted on our country caused by the government shutdown.

Advertisement

Democrats precipitated this shutdown to force Republicans to back off efforts to turn around our suicidal growth of government spending and debt.

House Republicans passed a continuing resolution ready for the president's signature to fund the government, but Democrats said no.

They refuse to get rid of $450 billion over 10 years in Obamacare premium subsidies that were enacted as temporary assistance during COVID-19.

Now, the more Americans squirm in discomfort from the shutdown, the more the Democrats love it. They want Republicans to cave.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which provides food assistance to almost 42 million Americans, is now forced to suspend payments, which will be partially covered with emergency funding.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told the press, "Republicans are willing to starve hungry children in this country and take away SNAP benefits."

Just several days prior, Jeffries endorsed Zohran Mamdani, the declared democratic socialist running as a Democrat for mayor of New York City.

SNAP is another government program going back to the 1960s, in which inefficient government largesse was sold as compassion.

In 1970, there were 6 million Americans receiving the benefit. Today, it is nearly 42 million.

SNAP spending just six years ago was $63.5 billion. Today, it is nearly $100 billion.

Per the American Enterprise Institute, "Less than half of able-bodied working-age SNAP recipients work, and many recipients receive benefits for years."

Advertisement

According to AEI, SNAP is "one of more than 80 means-tested safety-net programs in the U.S. designed to alleviate hardship among low-income households."

In 2023, spending on these programs, per former Sen. Phil Gramm, now a senior fellow at AEI, totaled $1.6 trillion, consuming "72.6% of unobligated general revenue."

Gramm compared that with defense spending, which fell to 37.2 percent of unobligated revenue in 2023 from 68 percent in 1967.

Welfare payments, per Gramm, going to "average work-age" households in the lowest fifth of income recipients, have increased inflation-adjusted 780 percent since 1967.

And "the portion of prime work-age persons" in the bottom fifth who work has fallen from 68 percent to 36 percent.

Clearly, the country's cultural and social problems and our fiscal problems go hand in hand.

Various proposals have been put forth for reforming SNAP. These include moving federal funds to states as block grants and giving states more responsibility in their management and disbursement. This was key to the successful welfare reform of 1996 that created Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.

But most critical is reform of the underlying welfare culture that has so destructively rooted into our country. Making government largesse more efficient is critical. But we must rebuild a culture in which individuals, in all income classes, feel personally responsible for their lives.

Some 16 years ago, Ron Haskins and Isabel Sawhill at the Brookings Institution published their research pointing to the "success sequence." Per Haskins, for those who followed these rules -- finish high school, get a full-time job, get married before having children – about 2 percent wound up in poverty and 75 percent wound up in the middle class.

Advertisement

We launched a program at CURE, the institute I founded in Washington, D.C., to publicize the "success sequence" in targeted low-income neighborhoods around the country. We bought billboard space that advertised the "success sequence" for getting out of poverty.

In two major cities where we posted the billboards, Minneapolis and Philadelphia, Black Lives Matter went to the billboard company and insisted they take it down -- which they did.

Know that the country's Left, today represented by the Democratic Party, hates the idea of personal responsibility, which is the cornerstone of personal freedom.

Democrats are taking us to cultural and fiscal bankruptcy. This is what Republicans want to change.

Star Parker is the founder of the Center for Urban Renewal and Education. Her recent book, "What Is the CURE for America?" is available now.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement