'This Is Where the Systematic Killing Took Place': 200 Days of War From...
White House Insists Biden Has Been 'Very Clear' About His Position on Pro-Hamas...
Watch Biden Lose the Battle With His Teleprompter Again
Thanks, Biden! Here's How Iran Is Still Making Billions to Fund Terrorism
Columbia Prof Who Called to Defund the Police, Now Wants Police to Protect...
Pelosi's Daughter Criticizes J6 Judges Who are 'Out for Blood' After Handing Down...
Mike Johnson Addresses Anti-Israel Hate As Hundreds Harass the School’s Jewish Community
DeSantis May Not Be Facing Biden in November, but Still Offers Perfect Response...
Lawmakers in One State Pass Legislation to Allow Teachers to Carry Guns in...
UnitedHealth Has Too Much Power
Former Democratic Rep. Who Lost to John Fetterman Sure Doesn't Like the Senator...
Biden Rewrote Title IX to Protect 'Trans' People. Here's How Somes States Responded.
Watch: Joe Biden's Latest Flub Is Laugh-Out-Loud Funny
Hundreds of Athletes Urge the NCAA to Allow Men to Compete Against Women
‘Net Neutrality’ Would Give Biden Wartime Powers to Censor Online Speech
OPINION

An Olympian of Chicanery

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

If political dishonesty were an Olympic sport, Missouri State Rep. Scott Largent would qualify for the medal round.

Rep. Largent has served two terms in the state’s lower house, representing the 120th District. Now he’s running as a “consistent conservative” in a three-way race in the newly redistricted Senate District 31.

Advertisement

The frontrunner has been Ed Emery, a constitutional conservative late of the Missouri State House, having been “termed out” after serving eight years under the state’s term limits law. Emery has garnered awards as Legislator of the Year from The American Legislative Exchange Council and Legislator of the Year from the 7th District Missouri Republican Assembly. Emery has also caught the eye of Tea Party members and other reformers for his principled defense of democratic checks like the state’s citizen initiative and referendum process, and for his stance against subsidies and general support for free markets.

Facing Emery must be an uphill battle, for Largent has stooped to extremely low tactics.

In a campaign mailer sent to voters in Missouri’s 31st state senate district just ahead of the August 7th GOP primary, Largent’s campaign attacked Emery for “Standing With Barack Obama and Missouri Democrats.”

How specifically did Republican Emery “stand” with the opposition?

Emery voted for a non-binding resolution condemning Obamacare, sure. But on one amendment to that resolution he sided against fellow Republicans. As an analysis on the Missouri First website puts it: “Emery voted against” that particular amendment because it “urged Congress to replace Obamacare with another federal scheme.”

Advertisement

Apparently no more fond of “we have to pass it to find out what’s in it” legislation when proposed by Republicans rather than Democrats, Emery refused to blindly endorse a new, undefined nationalized “solution.”

For that, he deserves a badge of honor.

But Scott Largent, the Solon of Smear, sent voters a copy of a letter on White House stationary purportedly from President Barack Obama to Ed Emery:

 

I wanted to personally thank you for your “no” vote yesterday on the amendment to HCR 18 regarding Obamacare. Your support is impressive considering you are a Republican in a state I could not even win.
The fact that you stood against every one of your Republican colleagues to support Democrats really impressed me. I truly hope you will be as willing to stand against your party in your future elected positions.

Only thing is, the letter is a fake.

It takes chutzpah to “forge ahead” against a consistent conservative like Emery and call yourself a “consistent conservative” . . . with a forgery. And a half-truth. And the pretense that Emery isn’t every bit as much against nationalized health care as anyone can be.

Advertisement

Indeed, by supporting the pig-in-a-poke provision of the resolution that Emery opposed, Largent implies that he would likely support a Republican version of Obamacare.

You know, like “Romneycare.”

There is no Olympic medal for either chutzpah or political dishonesty.

Let’s hope Show-Me State voters show Largent the agony of defeat.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos