Townhall Celebrates America 250
Where Are the Obamas and the Clintons on the Monsters Taking Over Their...
'Real Socialism' Was Tried in Venezuela, and It Failed
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 327: God’s Name in the Declaration of Independence
The Leech Has Two Daughters—Give and Give
Don’t Shop at Von’s
Mallory McMorrow Suspends U.S. Senate Campaign After Scandal-Plagued Run
Trump's America 250 Celebration Was One for the History Books
Gun-Grabbing Group Spends Independence Day Begging Politicians to Strip Down the Second Am...
Paul Pelosi Faces Potential Criminal Charges After Hit-and-Run Incident
These Patriots Refused to Surrender Their Independence Day Celebrations to a Summer Storm
12 Score and 10 Years Ago
Make Unsubsidized Passenger Rail a Condition of the Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern Merger
Obamacare's Fraud Bill Just Came Due
Ellison's Independence Day Video Sparks Backlash Amid Pardon Scandal
OPINION

Monstrous Moral Hybrids

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Monstrous Moral Hybrids

Sunday’s dinner of the Society for Development of Austrian Economics featured a keynote from George Mason University economics professor Richard Wagner. The talk brought back a lot of memories for me. Wagner was chair of my dissertation committee and it was in his graduate public finance class (back in 1992?) that I first gave any thought to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac when I wrote a paper on government sponsored enterprises. Little did I know I’d spend much of the following years working to reform Fannie and Freddie.

Advertisement

During his talk, Wagner invoked a term first used by Jane Jacobs: “monstrous moral hybrids.” I suspect Jacobs used the term to describe how Robert Moses managed to wield unaccountable power over development in New York City (Caro’s account of Moses, Power Broker, still being the single best read on city government). Ms. Jacobs describes two distinct moral syndromes,  commercial and guardian. Obviously commercial pertains to the market, while guardian can pertain to government. The monstrous moral hybrids are when we get the worst of both instincts combined in one entity. For instance, I generally view competition as a good thing; however, competition underwritten by government guarantees will almost always lead to disaster. Its competition without the discipline of failure.

I  repeatedly watched, while working in the Senate, Fannie/Freddie invoke their “private” nature in order to avoid regulation while invoking their “public” nature to gain protection and privilege. The result was little accountability from either the market or the government (our largest banks currently enjoy a smaller version). Of course, one of the primary differences in debates over financial regulation is the degree to which one believes that either the market or government provides accountability. Setting aside those debates, we should all be able to agree that companies should be either private or government. That the mixing of the two, government sponsored enterprises, is a recipe for avoiding accountability and transparency. But then I suspect that might have been the intent all along. Monstrous moral hybrids by design.

Advertisement

Mark Calabria, Cato Institute

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement