It's About Time Democrats Are Finally Calling Themselves Socialists
Democreeps Only Believe Women When It’s Useful to Them
Donna Brazile Calls on Graham Platner to Drop Out So He Can Do...
CNN Was Just Incapable of Enjoying the 4th of July—but They Were Not...
Alicia Keys Doesn't Want Women to Have Equal Rights
How Mike Rowe's 'Build Freedom' Aims to Restore the Dignity of American Work
Mamdani's Twisted View of America
Chicago’s Violence Interruption Industry Faces Questions After Homicides Tick Up
Culture Still Matters
How My Father Mastered Cooling Our House Without Air Conditioning
The Tyrant’s Funeral Cannot Bury the Truth
We're Officially the World's Most Hated Soccer Team
The U.S. Has Been Eliminated in the World Cup After a Historic Run
How Did This Mistake Already Happen Again?
Sen. John Fetterman Blasts Graham Platner's Backers After Newest Allegation
Tipsheet

Did Jake Tapper Seriously Just Ask a Retired Lt. General This Question About Iran?

Did Jake Tapper Seriously Just Ask a Retired Lt. General This Question About Iran?
Townhall Media

CNN's Jake Tapper has once again revealed his innate skill for journalism after he asked retired Lt. General Charles Moore if it had really been necessary to kill the top 49 senior officials of Iran, including the Ayatollah.

Advertisement

"Was it necessary to kill the top 49 leaders of Iran, including Ayatollah Khamenei, the supreme leader?" Tapper asked.

"I think it was a very wise move for a couple of reasons," Lt. General Moore replied. "First, anytime you can decapitate leadership in the government and military organizations, you put the whole country, the entire apparatus, in a state of upheaval. They don't know what's going on. It's extremely difficult for them to execute command and control, to have any type of synchronization or integration of their forces."

In other words, welcome to warfare.

Beyond the immediate disruption to command structures, there are more straightforward strategic realities at play. Senior leaders are the architects of wartime policy, the individuals who authorize operations, allocate resources, and set long-term strategy. Eliminating them means an easier time for U.S. troops and ensures our own operations are more effective, while the enemy remains in chaos.

Advertisement

There is also a deterrent effect. When senior leadership understands that it is not insulated from consequences, it alters incentives at the highest levels of power. If those who direct aggression know they personally bear the risk, future aggression becomes a far more serious decision, and one they are increasingly unlikely to make. How do we prevent other hardliners from leading Iran? By ensuring the new leaders know exactly what happens if you mess with the United States.

Finally, for nearly half a century, Iran’s senior leadership has financed terrorist organizations and directed proxy networks hostile to American interests, bearing responsibility for the deaths of thousands of Americans. Targeting that leadership is therefore seen as not only strategically significant but also as a form of justice for those Americans who lost their lives at the hands of Iran's murderous regime.

Editor's Note: For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all. 

Help us report the truth about the Trump administration’s decisive actions to keep Americans safe and bring peace to the world. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement