America's electricity sector is stuck in the past, dominated by monopoly utilities and Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) that stifle innovation and inflate bills. In most states, consumers have no choice. They must buy power from a single provider, leading to higher costs and sluggish progress. It's time to unleash true competition, just as we did for trucking, airlines, and telecommunications.
Those industries saw dramatic cost reductions of 20-30 percent, explosive innovation, and enhanced services after free enterprise principles were applied. Free enterprise of electricity will deliver the same, slashing bills and powering a brighter future.
Consider trucking. Before the Motor Carrier Act of 1980, Interstate Commerce Commission regulations propped up high rates and limited entry, inflating costs by 33 percent to 50 percent. Applying free enterprise shattered this, allowing new carriers to enter and negotiate directly with shippers.
Rates for truckload shipments fell 25 percent in real terms by 1982, while service quality improved as judged by shippers. Overall, it saved U.S. industry $38-56 billion annually in shipping and inventory costs, boosting efficiency and economic growth.
Small operators thrived, and consumers benefited from lower priced goods.
Airlines benefits were similar with the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. Under Civil Aeronautics Board control, fares were sky-high, and routes were restricted, leading to low load factors and inefficiency. Free enterprise freed carriers to set prices and routes, sparking a boom in new entrants and hub-and-spoke systems.
Real airfares dropped 45 percent since 1978, with passengers saving $19.4 billion yearly.
Travel surged, fueling tourism and jobs. Sure, consolidation occurred, but competition drove innovations like frequent-flyer programs and budget carriers, offering more benefits and choices for consumers.
Recommended
The 1996 Telecommunications Act applied free enterprise, which broke AT&T's grip, opening local and long-distance markets. Costs plummeted, AT&T's average revenue per minute fell 62 percent from 1984-1996, while competition spurred broadband expansion and mobile revolutions.
Bundled services emerged, and innovation exploded, from VoIP to streaming. The Bell companies even tried to suppress answering machines to keep their monopoly answering service Centrex alive. Answering machines saved consumers money every month. Though some criticized uneven access, overall efficiency gains lifted billions from poverty globally through better connectivity, and gave people in advanced economies a boost from the innovation, investments, and eventually cell phones.
Do you think we would have the robust cell phone services we enjoy today if ATT and the Bell Companies maintained their monopolies? We can reap the same benefits from free enterprise electricity generation, distribution, and real consumer choice.
Electricity lags behind these other industries in innovation, cost savings, and robust competition because of restrictive laws and regulations. In regulated states, utilities enjoy protected monopolies, passing inefficiencies onto ratepayers.
About 18 states have partial deregulation, often limited to retail choice where consumers pick suppliers but utilities still control generation and transmission. This half-measure misses the mark. It's like allowing resellers of truck space without owning trucks, airline seats without planes, or phone services without switches. Resellers merely repackage existing power, stifling true innovation in generation and distribution tech like advanced batteries, microgrids or even beaming electricity instead of wires.
Regulated monopolies are not incentivized to lower costs because this harms their bottom line. They are incentivized to spend more, not less, because they are allowed a rate of return on their capital spending, not on lower prices. In most states, utilities are allowed a rate of return between eight percent and 10 percent on their capital spending.
Texas, the closest to full deregulation, boasts 85 percent customer choice and lower industrial rates, drawing data centers and jobs. Competition would accelerate smart grids, demand-response tools and reduce electricity shortages.
Businesses could hedge prices, and consumers gain tailored plans—green energy, time-of-use rates, or bundled EV charging. Skeptics warn of volatility, but safeguards and oversight can mitigate risks, like the other successful models.
The trucking, airline, and telecom revolutions prove free enterprise and competition works. Real electricity deregulation isn't just about consumer choice and lower bills, it's about innovation, growth, and creating a way for free enterprise to meet our need for more reliable affordable electricity. By opening generation, transmission, and retail to competition, we'd see 20-30 percent cost drops through efficiency, as in other sectors.
Partial efforts haven’t gone far enough, because they don't break the infrastructure stranglehold. We need bold action: state law changes to end monopolies while promoting open access across electricity systems.
Let's flip the switch on monopolies and light up America's future with free enterprise electricity.
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member