Yet in all other respects I side with the pope, certainly on matters of faith and morals. On lesser matters, I have some quibbles. Purely as a managerial matter, would it not be better to allow priests to marry? I understand the economics of the problem. The Church is having a difficult time paying for one priest. At first glance, the economics would be even worse if the Church had to pay for a priest with a wife and children. But my guess is that each parish would find a way to make a go of their priests marrying. Would the married priest and his wife not be better able to run a parish school? At least that is my initial thought.
When it comes to practical questions and even questions of justice, I am glad Pope Francis has not invoked the doctrine of papal infallibility. On practical questions and even questions of justice, he has shown himself capable of being utterly wrongheaded. For instance, what was he doing holding hands with the Castro brothers. Why was he looking into their eyes? What did he expect to see?
Maybe he was looking for some flicker of recognition from their long-ago childhood days. In those days, Raul Castro was an apathetic but practicing Catholic, and Fidel was a bright student whom the Catholic hierarchy considered promising material for the priesthood. Was the pope anticipating Fidel's and perhaps Raul's return to the Church? Did he expect the Castro brothers to ask him to send over a priest after the journalists had moved on? I really do not know, but Pope Francis paid them more attention than he paid Cuban dissidents, whom he snubbed. Would Pope John Paul II have acted similarly?
Such miracles as the Castros' return to the Church can happen, I know, but first the brothers would have to repent the kind of imprisonment that was chronicled by Armando Valladares in "Against All Hope." The book is Valladares' prison memoir, and it recounts decades of imprisonment, torture and grisly murders of Cubans convicted by the Castros of yearning for democracy. The suffering is still going on today in Cuba, and the pope is not recorded to have done anything ameliorative about it. I like to think he put in a good word for Cuba's noble political prisoners, but who knows?
Likewise, his concern for the world's poor conflicts with his concern for the environment. If we were to go along with the trendy environmentalists' standards against carbon emissions, poverty would cease to be declining and would actually increase. As it is now, poverty has been declining throughout much of the world. The use of fossil-based fuels along with other chemicals and the adoption of capitalism explain the reason that abject poverty has declined by more than 50 percent over the past three decades across the globe. People are living better, longer and more promising lives because of capitalism and globalism worldwide than ever before. That is the unsung song of the early part of the 21st century.
I share the pope's concern for the environment, though I take leave of his characterization of planet Earth as "an immense pile of filth." Did the pope filch a line from the American left? The United States of America is making steady progress on the environment. Our country is ahead of itself in practically every environmental standard. It is time for the world to catch up with us.
Otherwise, I found the pope's visit all to the good. He goes easy on some matters that earlier popes have been steadfast on. Well, that is the prerogative of the Vicar of Christ on Earth. Let us see how he does with his modern style.